[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2016-10-14 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Luis Machado : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e913b9cb939c45ce9cbf0f224da6466cd3094c3a commit e913b9cb939c45ce9cbf0f224d

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2016-10-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to sandra from comment #9) > The test cases added for this PR are failing in remote-host testing because > the piece added to run_dump_test is only copying the file locally and not > downloading it to

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2016-10-06 Thread sandra at codesourcery dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 sandra at codesourcery dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at codesourcery

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cbd44e247ede49688e1e1fa42e57d390ad141967 commit cbd44e247ede49688e1e1fa42e57d390

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING Assignee|unassigned at so

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 8644 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8644&action=edit A patch Please try this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread ams at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs --- It generates an output file, the same as the interleave test does: $ echo -n abcdefgh > in $ objcopy -I binary -O binary \ --pad-to=10 --gap-fill=65 \ --reverse-bytes=8 \ in

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Andrew Stubbs from comment #2) > My patch in PR19005 has a testcase for --reverse-bytes, but that test passes. Does your testcase for --reverse-bytes generate output? I am looking for a testcase of

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread ams at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Stubbs --- My patch in PR19005 has a testcase for --reverse-bytes, but that test passes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug binutils/19020] objcopy interleave feature broken

2015-09-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19020 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f