[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-29 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 --- Comment #6 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 19:31:05 UTC --- Changing the type of compressed_size from bfd_size_type to uLong should solve it because we are playing with zlib's rules here anyway. Like: Index: bfd/compress.c ===

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.20|2.21 (HEAD) -- Configure bugmail: http://so

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2010-10-29 18:40:49 UTC --- I have no problem with zlib 1.2.3. Is this a new problem with zlib 1.2.5? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mai

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sezeroz at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug binutils/12075] binutils doesn't build with zlib-devel-1.2.5.

2010-10-29 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12075 --- Comment #5 from sezeroz at gmail dot com 2010-10-29 18:44:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I have no problem with zlib 1.2.3. Is this a new problem > with zlib 1.2.5? Bug 12170 is already reported using zlib 1.2.3, so the answer is no.