https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28902
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbyszek at in dot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15373
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zbyszek at in dot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16504
--- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Bernhard, thanks for fixing the test case. Looks like I pasted only part of the
file.
I don't have binutils-2.30 here yet, but I get the same result with
binutils-2.29.1-20.fc28.x86_64.
--
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: zbyszek at in dot waw.pl
==> liba.c <==
const char* sd_get_seats(void) {return "bla bla";}
==> liba.sym <==
LIBSYSTEMD_209 {
global:
sd_get
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16477
--- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Yes indeed, everything works with current git version. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16467
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16477
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: zbyszek at in dot waw.pl
This is a continuation of pr16467, but a different failure.
Tests below are performed with binutils git
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16467
--- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
So, once again (with patched ld installed as /usr/bin/ld):
(gold, a versioned, b unversioned)
$ gcc -shared -o liba.so liba.c -fPIC -Wl,--version-script=liba.sym
-Wl,-fuse-ld=gold
$
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16467
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I tried again, without success. I still get an internal error with just the
ld
patch on top of binutils git. Is the glibc patch still necessary?
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16467
--- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
> Can you double check if gold generates the working output?
It seemed to be working for me before, in the sense that at least linking
worked without any error report, and the binary lin
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16467
--- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Thanks for the incredibly fast response.
I had a bit of trouble compiling binutils from source (ld would complain ab
out
not being compiled to use in a sysroot). In the end I applied y
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: zbyszek at in dot waw.pl
We are merging two libraries into one. I was trying to create a compatibility
library to allow existing
13 matches
Mail list logo
