[Bug binutils/32399] buffer overflow printing core_file_failing_command

2024-12-10 Thread xiezhiheng at huawei dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32399 --- Comment #4 from xiezhiheng --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2) > Fixed for this particular mach-o testcase, and a few other target cores. Sorry to bother you. Does this problem constitute a security vulnerability? If it is indeed

[Bug binutils/32399] New: A heap buffer overflow is found in display_bfd of binutils 2.44 (HEAD) in size.c:354

2024-11-27 Thread xiezhiheng at huawei dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: xiezhiheng at huawei dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15808 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15808&

[Bug ld/30768] X86: copy relocation against non-copyable protected symbol

2023-08-16 Thread xiezhiheng at huawei dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30768 --- Comment #2 from xiezhiheng --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > I have > > have-protected-data = no > > in config.make. What do you have? In my config.make, have-protected-data = yes Oh I think I find something interesting. Tha

[Bug ld/30768] New: X86: copy relocation against non-copyable protected symbol

2023-08-15 Thread xiezhiheng at huawei dot com
Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: xiezhiheng at huawei dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I recently met a link error when I built glibc-2.38 with binutils 2.40. The error is [ 1568s] /usr/bin/ld: /home/abuild