[Bug gas/21874] x86: Multiple segment registers in the address are not detected with -masm=intel

2017-11-10 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874 --- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak --- (In reply to Uros Bizjak from comment #13) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > > Someone bothered enough to open a bug report with a testcase. That is > > good enough for me. > > gcc generated

[Bug gas/21874] x86: Multiple segment registers in the address are not detected with -masm=intel

2017-11-10 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874 --- Comment #13 from Uros Bizjak --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Someone bothered enough to open a bug report with a testcase. That is > good enough for me. gcc generated non-sensical output in -asm=intel mode, and assembler fa

[Bug gas/21874] x86: Multiple segment registers in the address are not detected with -masm=intel

2017-08-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21874 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.27 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug gas/21874] New: x86: Multiple segment registers in the address are not detected with -masm=intel

2017-08-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ubizjak at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Following assembly: --cut here-- .intel_syntax noprefix mov eax, DWORD PTR gs:ds:16

[Bug ld/20092] Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu -- You are receiving

[Bug ld/20092] Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak --- Created attachment 9260 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9260&action=edit Second object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug ld/20092] Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20092 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak --- Created attachment 9259 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9259&action=edit First object file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug ld/20092] New: Wrong relaxation with R_X86_64_GOTPCREL

2016-05-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: ubizjak at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Soon to be attached object files, compiled from GCC testsuite (gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386): $ gcc -mcmodel=medium -fpic -fdata-sections -c pr61599-1.c and $ gcc -mcmodel=medium

[Bug ld/5276] linking fails with large C++ projects with -Wl,--relax

2015-03-27 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug gas/13572] x86-32: Assembler does not accept "QWORD PTR" for "cvttps2pi" instruction

2013-07-06 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
||hjl.tools at gmail dot com, ||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak --- I have hit this problem with --cut here-- .intel_syntax noprefix cvtps2pi%mm0, QWORD PTR [rbp-16] cvttps2pi%mm0, QWORD PTR

[Bug gas/14457] Bad register name in "bad register name" error

2012-08-12 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14457 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 -- Configure bugmail: http://source

[Bug gas/14457] New: Bad register name in "bad register name" error

2012-08-12 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14457 Bug #: 14457 Summary: Bad register name in "bad register name" error Product: binutils Version: 2.22 Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: gas

[Bug ld/12928] Wrong linker relaxation with TLSLDM relocation on alpha

2011-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net --- Comment

[Bug ld/12928] Wrong linker relaxation with TLSLDM relocation on alpha

2011-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Wrong linker relaxation |Wrong linker relaxation

[Bug ld/12608] TLS relocations issues on alpha

2011-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
||ubizjak at gmail dot com Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #14 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-24 18:36:27 UTC --- Dupe of Bug 12928. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12928 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org

[Bug ld/12928] Wrong linker relaxation with DTPREL relocation on alpha

2011-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-24 09:09:31 UTC --- I think that I got the problem, but the wrong relaxation is in main. in an object, we have following part of test_code: 10:00 00 5e b7 stqra,0(sp) 14:08 00 3e b5

[Bug ld/12928] Wrong linker relaxation with DTPREL relocation on alpha

2011-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-24 07:59:10 UTC --- The difference to working code (test_code function) from gcc-4.4.5 is: @@ -26,17 +26,18 @@ ldah $1,fstat($0)!dtprelhi ldq $26,0($30) lda $29,0($29)!gpd

[Bug ld/12928] Wrong linker relaxation with DTPREL relocation on alpha

2011-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu -- Configure bug

[Bug ld/12928] New: Wrong linker relaxation with DTPREL relocation on alpha

2011-06-24 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12928 Summary: Wrong linker relaxation with DTPREL relocation on alpha Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: l

[Bug ld/12920] TLS definition in /tmp/ccOmFuXQ.ltrans0.ltrans.o section .tdata mismatches non-TLS definition in /tmp/ccmpmoGc.o.ironly section .text

2011-06-22 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12920 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ld/12920] TLS definition in /tmp/ccOmFuXQ.ltrans0.ltrans.o section .tdata mismatches non-TLS definition in /tmp/ccmpmoGc.o.ironly section .text

2011-06-22 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12920 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||alphaev68-pc-linux-gnu Hos

[Bug ld/12920] New: TLS definition in /tmp/ccOmFuXQ.ltrans0.ltrans.o section .tdata mismatches non-TLS definition in /tmp/ccmpmoGc.o.ironly section .text

2011-06-22 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12920 Summary: TLS definition in /tmp/ccOmFuXQ.ltrans0.ltrans.o section .tdata mismatches non-TLS definition in /tmp/ccmpmoGc.o.ironly section .text Product: binutils Version: 2

[Bug ld/12882] Wrong @dtpoff relocation with -pie

2011-06-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-13 17:49:11 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Please try the Linux binutils 2.21.52.0.2: Yes, the testcase works OK with: ld --version GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.21.52.0.2.20110610 Copyright 2011

[Bug ld/12882] Wrong @dtpoff relocation with -pie

2011-06-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5791|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug ld/12882] Wrong @dtpoff relocation with -pie

2011-06-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-13 17:15:11 UTC --- C source to illustrate the problem: --cut here-- extern void abort (void); __thread int tls_ld __attribute__((tls_model("local-dynamic"))) = 1; __thread int tls_ld2 __attribute__((t

[Bug ld/12882] New: Wrong @dtpoff relocation with -pie

2011-06-13 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12882 Summary: Wrong @dtpoff relocation with -pie Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.

[Bug gas/12610] gas calculates wrong difference between two labels

2011-03-28 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610 --- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-03-28 18:50:43 UTC --- Created attachment 5334 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5334 .ii source -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Y

[Bug gas/12610] gas calculates wrong difference between two labels

2011-03-28 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610 --- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-03-28 18:49:06 UTC --- Created attachment 5333 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5333 .o object files -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

[Bug gas/12610] gas calculates wrong difference between two labels

2011-03-28 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-03-28 18:46:17 UTC --- Created attachment 5332 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5332 .s sources -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- Y

[Bug gas/12610] gas calculates wrong difference between two labels

2011-03-28 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target||alpha-linux-gnu -- Configure bugmail: h

[Bug gas/12610] New: gas calculates wrong difference between two labels

2011-03-28 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610 Summary: gas calculates wrong difference between two labels Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: un

[Bug ld/12564] New: GNU ld internal ironly section should not be leaking warnings

2011-03-10 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12564 Summary: GNU ld internal ironly section should not be leaking warnings Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug ld/11891] linker changes target register in tlsgd load

2010-08-06 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-08-06 18:39 --- Created an attachment (id=4918) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4918&action=view) Asm dump -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11891 --- You are receiving th

[Bug ld/11891] New: linker changes target register in tlsgd load

2010-08-06 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
ad Product: binutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: ubizjak at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at

[Bug ld/10579] LSDA section is linked off-by 0x11 from FDE

2009-09-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-01 11:48 --- This works OK with 2.19.51.20090901 snapshot. The failure was triggered with 2.19.1 release on both x86_64 cross and alpha native in my case. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10579

[Bug ld/10579] LSDA section is linked off-by 0x11 from FDE

2009-09-01 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-09-01 09:55 --- This problem can be reproduced by a crosscompiler to alpha-unknown-linux-gnu target. The addend in the object file is already wrong. Steps to reproduce: crossassemble with alpha-...-as the assembly source, as

[Bug ld/10579] LSDA section is linked off-by 0x11 from FDE

2009-08-31 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-31 19:35 --- Created an attachment (id=4157) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4157&action=view) executable -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10579 --- You are receivi

[Bug ld/10579] LSDA section is linked off-by 0x11 from FDE

2009-08-31 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-31 19:33 --- Created an attachment (id=4156) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4156&action=view) object source -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10579 --- You are receivi

[Bug ld/10579] LSDA section is linked off-by 0x11 from FDE

2009-08-31 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-08-31 19:16 --- Created an attachment (id=4155) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4155&action=view) assembly source -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10579 --- You are re

[Bug ld/10579] New: LSDA section is linked off-by 0x11 from FDE

2009-08-31 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
l Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: ubizjak at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: alphaev68-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: alphaev68-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: al