[Bug gas/9687] Weak symbols not working on mingw32

2009-03-21 Thread tcl_de at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From tcl_de at gmx dot net 2009-03-21 09:39 --- Dave, you should probably have a look at http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2729. In that bug, you can see how the interix people dealt with the problem... (they did use IMAGE_WEAK_EXTERN_SEARCH_ALIAS

[Bug gas/9687] Weak symbols not working on mingw32

2009-03-18 Thread tcl_de at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From tcl_de at gmx dot net 2009-03-18 15:02 --- Created an attachment (id=3830) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3830&action=view) This is the modified weak.o (with IMAGE_WEAK_EXTERN_SEARCH_ALIAS) -- http://sourceware.org/b

[Bug gas/9687] Weak symbols not working on mingw32

2009-03-18 Thread tcl_de at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From tcl_de at gmx dot net 2009-03-18 15:00 --- Created an attachment (id=3829) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3829&action=view) This is the original weak.o generated by gas This is the original weak.o generated by gas --

[Bug gas/9687] Weak symbols not working on mingw32

2009-03-18 Thread tcl_de at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From tcl_de at gmx dot net 2009-03-18 14:57 --- @Dave Korn: I added you as a CC because I saw that thread on the mailinglist where you say that you want to make weak symbols work on cygwin with binutils. The same I write about mingw32 here is true for cygwin 1.7

[Bug ld/9687] Weak symbols not working on mingw32

2008-12-29 Thread tcl_de at gmx dot net
--- Additional Comments From tcl_de at gmx dot net 2008-12-29 09:17 --- (In reply to comment #1) > As a GNU extension, weak symbols that do not specify an alternate > symbol are supported. If the symbol is undefined when linking, > the symbol uses a default val

[Bug ld/9687] New: Weak symbols not working on mingw32

2008-12-27 Thread tcl_de at gmx dot net
Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: tcl_de at gmx dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9687 --- You are receiving this mail becaus