[Bug binutils/24460] bfd/elf32-arm.c: get_value_helper, uninitialized value used

2019-04-23 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24460 --- Comment #1 from Sudakshina Das --- Patch proposed https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-04/msg00227.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-bi

[Bug binutils/24460] bfd/elf32-arm.c: get_value_helper, uninitialized value used

2019-04-17 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24460 Sudakshina Das changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug binutils/24460] bfd/elf32-arm.c: get_value_helper, uninitialized value used

2019-04-17 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24460 Sudakshina Das changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sudi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

2019-03-01 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #7 from Sudakshina Das --- We have added extra options for every feature that has been explicitly mentioned as optional and backported in the architecture. The reason why we are not adding the rest is to prevent an explosion of com

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

2019-02-28 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #5 from Sudakshina Das --- If we take Armv8.5-A as an example and if we check include/opcode/aarch64.h for all the new feature bits added /* Flag Manipulation insns. */ #define AARCH64_FEATURE_FLAGMANIP 0x40ULL /* F

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

2019-02-28 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #3 from Sudakshina Das --- Hi Richard Sorry for the delay in getting back on this. I agree that the specs say that any Armv8.[N+1] feature is optional on Armv8.x. However in order to implement that, we would have to make every fea

[Bug gas/24279] ARMv8.5 extension incorrectly named "predres" instead of "predinv"

2019-02-28 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24279 --- Comment #2 from Sudakshina Das --- Hi Richard We chose the name based on what instructions it is turning on - [Control Flow/Data Value/Cache Prefetch] Prediction Restriction by Context I agree that the internal naming is different. Howeve

[Bug gas/24258] v8.5 extension "frintts" missing as a separate feature

2019-02-25 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24258 --- Comment #1 from Sudakshina Das --- Hi Richard As far as I can see, frintts is not on optional feature on Armv8.5-A and thus I don't believe a command line argument is needed, unless I missed something. Sudi -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug ld/23195] [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-18 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23195 --- Comment #2 from Sudakshina Das --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/m

[Bug ld/23195] [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-17 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23195 Sudakshina Das changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu -- You are r

[Bug ld/23195] New: [AArch64] ld-aarch64/ifunc-9 failing

2018-05-17 Thread sudi at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sudi at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Since the following commit: commit 4ec0995016801cc5d5cf13baf6e10163861e6852 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon May 14 03:55:37 2018 -0700 x86; Allow IFUNC pointer defined in PDE