https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28144
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Sent https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-July/117503.html for
review.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: vapier at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
It's a forward of downstream
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138
--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> A patch is posted at
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-July/117502.html
The patch works for nodejs. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Here is the full reproducer: 1200 interdependent files required for a thin
archive.
gcc-11.1.0 + binutils-2.36.1:
$ ./mk.bash
thin archive for 1200
176
gcc-11.1.0 + binutils-2.37:
$ ./mk.bas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I think I got closer to the problem: it's a bad error handling related to
-EMFILE (too many open files). nodejs is probably just very close to open file
limit (default 1023):
$ strace -f -olog -e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28139
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13568
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13568&action=edit
preprocessed.c
Attached preprocessed file extracted as:
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -O2 -fno-PIE -
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28139
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13567
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13567&action=edit
b.o
b.o is a binary generated on my system.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
: binutils
Version: 2.37
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Yes, the same failure happens on gcc-11.1.0 + binutils-2.37. I hoped that the
failure is immediately obvious.
I'll spend some time in attempt to extract minimal example from nodejs for
easier explora
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I used the following reproducer linker script for bisection.
Fun fact: If I comment out all the -plugin/-plugin-opt= flags the link will
succeed.
$ cat repro.bash
#!/bin/bash
cmd=(
# bisect
/home/
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28138
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13566
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13566&action=edit
net-libs:nodejs-16.5.0:20210725-155525.log.xz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Initially noticed as a nodejs-14.17.3 li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27967
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #0)
> Hi Sergei,
>
> I am not exactly sure what the error is here. The linker's message seems
> pretty exp
Version: 2.34
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Host: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27837
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Created attachment 13462 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi Sergei
>
> How about this patch ? It allows the link to complete, but it still
> issues a
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
This is a forward of https://bugs.gentoo.org/788901 bug by Petr Šabata.
Petr uses LDFLAGS+=-Wl,--relax system-wide. glibc (and ghc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #11 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
> Created attachment 13222 [details]
> A patch with run-time check for multi-byte NOPs
>
> Try this.
User reported that it works as well: https://bugs.gentoo.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27412
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> A patch is posted at
>
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115343.html
Works for me. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27412
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #0)
> > When building current linux-5.10 (or master) with gcc-11/binutins-2.36 gas
> > complains about incorrect (u
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: amodra at gmail dot com, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When buildi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #6)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > > Created attachment 13220 [details]
> > > An updated patch
> > >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> Created attachment 13220 [details]
> An updated patch
>
> Try this.
The user reports it's building fine for them on i486:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/770061#c26
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13219
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13219&action=edit
binutils-gdb-fix-cet.patch
We debugged it in https://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=686394 a bit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Created attachment 13218 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please try this.
Asked user to try in https://bugs.gentoo.org/770061#c16, failed in a simialr
way. I'll debug
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
This is a forward of downstream bugs:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/760926
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #8 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #4)
> Works for me with GCC 11 (1/31/21 snapshot).
>
> Please also throw in a -v option on your gcc command and attach the verbose
> output. I'd like to see wha
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13201
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13201&action=edit
initpri3a.readelf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 13200
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13200&action=edit
initpri3.o.readelf
initpri3.o.readelf
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Cary Coutant from comment #2)
> I haven't yet managed to get a clean build of GCC 11 to try to reproduce,
> but I do have a suspicion. Gold reverses the .ctors entries in .init_array,
> a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
Com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27303
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: admin
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
The test fails as is on gold:
$ gcc-11.0.0 initpri3.c -o bug -fuse-ld=lld && ./bug
bug: initp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22755
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Re-discovered in https://github.com/gentoo-haskell
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23607
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23607
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
It's a forward of test failures observed downstream
https://bugs.gentoo.org/754246 by ernsteiswuerfel.
Here
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26762
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Aha, we'll try to find another workaround downstream then.
Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Original bug was a failed attempt to build llvm-11 with LDFLAGS="-flto
-Wl,--as-n
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26236
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
File gcc-specific bug at mixing crtbeginS.o / srtend.o as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/PR96190.
But after it's fixed I think ld should not generate R_SPARC_NONE relocations
for such inputs.
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26236
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 12695
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12695&action=edit
binutils-R_SPARC_NONE-reloc.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Target: sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
Initially the problem was observed by Rolf Eike Beer on elfutils as
https://bugs.gentoo.org/619706.
There elutils test suite
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Initially observed the crash when building ncurses-6.2 on powerpc64 using
ru_RU.UTF-8 locale.
$ locale
LANG=ru_RU.UTF-8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25745
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25694
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #1)
> I believe this is the same as bug 22263, which added a testcase, so we
> already have a ld testsuite failure for it. The problem also shows up in
> openembe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22909
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Gentoo still has that check enabled. A few days ago it found the problem in
riscv64 as bug #25694 (a case of bug #22263).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25694
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andrew at sifive dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25694
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||palmer at dabbelt dot com
--
Yo
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Host: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target: riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: x86_64-pc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
--- Comment #13 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> It is independent of -fno-common:
>
>
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr25355]$ cat x.c
> int nm_test_var = 30;
>
> extern int foo (void);
>
> int
> main ()
> {
> retu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25316
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Was pushed as
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=b26a3d5827edcb942b3af5b921bf317bbc0c8e83
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25331
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||mmix-*
CC|
: binutils
Version: 2.33
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 12160
--> ht
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25331
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 12161
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12161&action=edit
min-bug.s
min-bug.s was generated by -save-temps.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25316
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Sent for review as https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-12/msg00340.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25316
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 12147
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12147&action=edit
binutils-2.32-ia64-allow-binary-merge.patch
It looks like other targets (like mips and riscv64) just
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25316
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
AFAIU eary failure happens at input checking against ELF:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=bfd/elfnn-ia64.c;h=459d986c0350f5e5982c7738ea69273f2ae97f7a;hb=HEAD#l4744
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Bug originally reported at https://bugs.gentoo.org/699180 by Émeric Maschino.
Small reproducer:
$ echo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24225
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||nios2-*
--
You are receiving th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24225
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I think the problem here happens at bfd/elf32-nios2.c:3846:
static bfd_boolean nios2_elf32_relocate_section (bfd *output_bfd, ...) {
...
char msgbuf[256];
...
/* xgettext:c-format
: binutils
Version: 2.32
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
When linking a huge program (GHC) ld attempted
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23968
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||toolchain at gentoo dot org
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23968
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
Y
Version: 2.31
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
sultan on freenode/#gentoo-toolchain reported a
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 11435
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1143
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21518
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld.gold should ignmore -pie |ld.gold should ignore -pie
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23892
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Diffing 'objdump -x bug1-bfd.o' and 'objdump -x bug1-gold.o' shows that
register number is changed:
bfd: REG_G6 g R *UND* a
gold: REG_G4 g R *UND*
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23892
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 11400
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11400&action=edit
bug.tar.gz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Version: 2.31
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Initially observed
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 11364
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11364&action=edit
t.tar.gz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23653
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc-*
Host|
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23271
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
--- Comment #9 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #8)
> > Gentoo has two libbfd-2.30.0.so libraries with incompatible ABIs:
> > One of them is built --enable-64-bit-bfd, then other is not
>
> Ouch, that would exp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23534
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23527
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #4)
> I'll try to find exact llvm commit that fixed it.
Found it:
commit 930bcc9bdfb9542a292c3de874d7e6ba1464cfe0
Author: George Rimar
Date: Tue Feb 2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23527
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23527
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23527
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Binutils target is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binut
utils
Version: 2.31
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 11183
--&g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Managed to craft an object file to trigger needed asserts.
As a bonus the test also causes out-of-bounds read access in ld and causes
SIGSEGV:
# cat bug.S
# trying to trigger BFD_ASSERTs to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 11151
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11151&action=edit
bug.S
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 11150
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11150&action=edit
binutils-gdb-sh4-better-errors.patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22706
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I'm afraid I can't reproduce it on current toolchain versions as is (something
was fixed): gcc-8.1.0, binutils-2.30, glibc-2.27
I'll try to craft relocations to point to invalid instructions to trigg
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23207
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 11034
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11034&action=edit
bug-orig.o
bug-orig.o is an object file produced by gcc on libressl-2.6.4
--
You are receiving thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23207
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #4)
> Created attachment 11033 [details]
> bug-2.o
crash backtrace for it:
$ gdb --args ~/dev/git/binutils-gdb-hppa2.0/ld/ld-new -shared -o libbug.so
bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23207
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to cvs-com...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #2)
> The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;
> h=7455c018e45766ab7193cbd45f9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23207
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 11033
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11033&action=edit
bug-2.o
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23207
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Minimal reproducer does not require any external objects:
$ hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-ld -shared -o libbug.so bug.o
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23207
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|hppa ld SIGSEGVs on invalid |hppa ld SIGSEGVs on invalid
: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 11031
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11031&action=edit
bug.o
Original bug found on libressl: https://bugs.gentoo.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22909
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I was not able to force x86 targets to generate TEXTREL executables.
Best I could do is to emit pseudo textrel but it does not cause TEXTREL section
creation:
// a.c
#include
int _start() {
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Gentoo enables --warn-shared-textrel by default for and extends warning to all
dynamic executables (PIE or not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22828
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at sourceware dot org
---
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 10800
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10800&action=edit
0001-ru.po-fix-format
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15891
Sergei Trofimovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at inbox dot ru
--
You
Version: 2.30 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Target Milestone: ---
Attempted to build glibc for sh4-unknown
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22626
--- Comment #7 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5)
> If you cannot reproduce the problem with a --disable-default-pie compiler by
> using the appropriate combination of options (-pie -fPIE), then the problem
>
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
