[Bug binutils/11037] New: invalid code generation depending on code position

2009-12-01 Thread serpilliere at droids-corp dot org
Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: serpilliere at droids-corp dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http

[Bug binutils/10704] as segfault in memory lookup intel syntax

2009-10-07 Thread serpilliere at droids-corp dot org
--- Additional Comments From serpilliere at droids-corp dot org 2009-10-07 12:18 --- Sorry, my fault. It's ok here too. Thanks! -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10704 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, o

[Bug binutils/10704] as segfault in memory lookup intel syntax

2009-10-07 Thread serpilliere at droids-corp dot org
--- Additional Comments From serpilliere at droids-corp dot org 2009-10-07 08:34 --- I applyied both patch; If I test the ccMaqFcN.s file, it doesn't assert but it segfault again: $ cat ccMaqFcN.s_cp .intel_syntax .LC0: .string "dummy" lea %eax, DWORD P

[Bug binutils/10704] as segfault in memory lookup intel syntax

2009-10-01 Thread serpilliere at droids-corp dot org
--- Additional Comments From serpilliere at droids-corp dot org 2009-10-01 15:33 --- The patch avoid seg fault. But It still doesn't assemble such code (a little bit different): $ cat ccMaqFcN.s .intel_syntax .LC0: .string "dummy" lea %eax, DWORD PTR[ ...

[Bug binutils/10704] New: as segfault in memory lookup intel syntax

2009-09-29 Thread serpilliere at droids-corp dot org
in memory lookup intel syntax Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: serpilliere at droids-corp dot