[Bug gold/16794] gold doesn't include the "implicit addend" when processing REL relocations to mergable sections

2019-09-10 Thread rprichard at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 --- Comment #8 from Ryan Prichard --- > In a string merge section, sym+offset is valid only for offset within the > string at sym. The GNU assembler is apparently willing to use section+offset to identify a mergeable string for some relocati

[Bug gold/16794] gold doesn't include the "implicit addend" when processing REL relocations to mergable sections

2019-09-09 Thread rprichard at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 --- Comment #6 from Ryan Prichard --- I attached another test case to the Android NDK issue, https://github.com/android/ndk/issues/1076. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/16794] gold doesn't include the "implicit addend" when processing REL relocations to mergable sections

2019-09-09 Thread rprichard at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 --- Comment #5 from Ryan Prichard --- Created attachment 11983 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11983&action=edit testcase 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug gold/16794] gold doesn't include the "implicit addend" when processing REL relocations to mergable sections

2019-09-09 Thread rprichard at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 Ryan Prichard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danalbert at google dot com -- You a

[Bug gold/16794] gold doesn't include the "implicit addend" when processing REL relocations to mergable sections

2019-09-09 Thread rprichard at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16794 Ryan Prichard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rprichard at google dot com

[Bug binutils/22941] binutils build fails if intl/plural.y is newer than intl/plural.c

2018-03-08 Thread rprichard at google dot com
, ||rprichard at google dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/22941] binutils build fails if intl/plural.y is newer than intl/plural.c

2018-03-08 Thread rprichard at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22941 Ryan Prichard changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|binutils build fails if |binutils build fails if

[Bug binutils/22941] New: binutils build fails if intl/parser.y is newer than intl/parser.c

2018-03-08 Thread rprichard at google dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: rprichard at google dot com Target Milestone: --- binutils has the same non-deterministic build problem that was reported in https://sourceware.org/bugzilla

[Bug gas/4029] relax_segment can't stabilize .gcc_except_table

2018-01-12 Thread rprichard at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4029 Ryan Prichard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rprichard at google dot com