--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-01-19
18:18 ---
as I see in the code for lnkproperties.h
public:
// WARNING: Do *NOT* define this yourself. The SL5xxx from SHARP does NOT
// have this class.
#ifdef QTOPIA_INTERNAL_FSLP
LnkProperties( AppLnk* lnk
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-01-16
00:27 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Created an attachment (id=4524)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4524&action=view)
> preprocessed testcase
>
-fvisibility-inlines-hidde
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-01-16
00:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=4524)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4524&action=view)
preprocessed testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11175
---
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #4523|application/octet-stream|application/x-bzip
mime type||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-01-15
21:37 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> `-fvisibility-inlines-hidden'
> This switch declares that the user does not attempt to compare
> pointers to inline methods where the addresses of the
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-01-15
18:42 ---
after reading the googlegroups thread if ld will propagate most restrictive
visibility to the output for a symbol irrespective of its definition then I
think this is not what gcc thinks when generating code
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-01-15
18:29 ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > In reply to comment #6. Look again.
> > $ nm -o *.o | grep _ZN13LnkPropertiesD1Ev
> > fileselector.o: U _
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2010-01-15
06:33 ---
the testcase is here
http://uclibc.org/~kraj/ld-pr11175.tar.bz2
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary: ld marks destructor hidden global
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
Report
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2009-01-27
03:09 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi Khem,
>
> Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for
> you.
>
> Cheers
> Nick
>
Hi Nick
Yes it fixes t
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2009-01-21
19:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=3678)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3678&action=view)
shell script, generates the testcase and executes it.
--
http://sourceware.org/b
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i386-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: i386-redhat-linux
GCC
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2009-01-02
20:51 ---
Hi Nick
It is fixed in ld built from todays sources.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||raj dot khem at gmail dot
||com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2008-12-24
01:06 ---
I still see this bug on binutils from trunk
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld --hash-style=gnu -b binary /dev/null
arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.19.51.20081204 internal error,
aborting at
/home
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2007-01-31
20:04 ---
Too quick to resolve fixed. I think it should change status after the patch is
accepted/committed to repository.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2007-01-31
20:03 ---
Thanks a lot Nick. I tested this patch and it fixes my problem.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2007-01-26
21:45 ---
Here is some more information.
Steps to reproduce
../binutils/configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu
--target=mips-montavista-linux-gnu
--prefix=/opt/montavista/foundation/devkit/mips/mips2_fp_be
make
the
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2007-01-25
18:04 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Subject: Re: ld segfaults in mips_elf_create_dynamic_relocation
>
> Hi Raj,
>
> > OK I found something interesting its with the ld names
> >
> >
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2007-01-24
23:22 ---
OK I found something interesting its with the ld names
if I use ld-new it works fine but we rename it to mips2_fp_be-ld and it
segfaulted. However then I played with the ld binary name size I started adding
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2007-01-12
20:33 ---
hmmm I could reproduce it with todays snapshot too.
GNU ld version 2.17.50 20070112
I am using FC6 to build ld but I could see it happening on centos3 machine as
well so probably not a
host issue.
I
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2007-01-10
19:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=1483)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1483&action=view)
testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3852
--- You are receivi
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-06
21:01 ---
verified with uclibc builds.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-06
21:01 ---
It seems to have been fixed now. I am not sure but may be
fix for bug #3532 fixed this one too.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-04
19:47 ---
verified by doing local glibc-cvs build
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-04
19:46 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Subject: Re: GAS errors on valid code complaining missing.cfi_endproc
>
> Hi Khem,
>
> Jakub has just checked in a patch that should fix this:
>
>
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3607
--- You are receiving this ma
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-01
22:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=1446)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1446&action=view)
the patch that uncovers the reported issue
This patch when applied on top of cvs sources p
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-01
22:33 ---
Hi Nick
Yes its not reproducible with cvs binutils. I realised that after a while. Its
one of the local patches I apply
than this issue happens. This has been working.
I debugged gas a bit.
My patch
issing
.cfi_endproc
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail d
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||guptan at hotmail dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3531
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-11-16
20:42 ---
Created an attachment (id=1424)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1424&action=view)
testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3532
--- You are receivi
ld/bfd assertion failure while linking thumb code.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot k
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-11-16
20:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=1423)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1423&action=view)
testcase
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3531
--- You are receivi
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at bigpond dot net
||dot au
http://sourceware.org/bugzil
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-11-07
02:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=1403)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1403&action=view)
testcase
ppc-9xx-as -a64 xx.s
will produce the corrupt object. the entry in .rela.roc is cor
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-11-07
02:06 ---
In the correct object it looks like
Relocation section '.rela.toc' at offset 0x1cc28 contains 179 entries:
Offset Info Type Sym. ValueSym. Name +
Addend00
: binutils
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC bui
file
Product: binutils
Version: 2.17 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,drow at false dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: mips64-linux-gnu
http
42 matches
Mail list logo
