[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-17 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 --- Comment #3 from Baoshan --- I checked a little bit of the code, what I see for this issue the difference between 2.29 and 2.30 is that: For 2.29 the checking if a symbol is hidden is before the calling of function elf_x86_64_convert_load_r

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-17 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 --- Comment #2 from Baoshan --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Hi Baoshan, > > I cannot reproduce this problem using today's mainline development > sources. Please could you check and see if the problem still exists > for

[Bug ld/23189] bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-16 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23189 Baoshan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pangbw at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/23189] New: bad symbol index: ffffffff

2018-05-16 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pangbw at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 11020 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11020&action=edit the linker script I am seeing bad relocation is created for hidden symbols with

[Bug gas/23154] invalid register expression

2018-05-09 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154 --- Comment #5 from Baoshan --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4) > That's the point of the warning, an operand written as register but isn't > one. Is there any place/document I can check that's saying %r0 can not be used in this

[Bug gas/23154] invalid register expression

2018-05-09 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154 Baoshan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug gas/23154] invalid register expression

2018-05-09 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154 --- Comment #2 from Baoshan --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > For the second line, the second operand is not a register but the constant 0 > (equivalent to lis %r5,2). Do you mean even it is written as %r0 it is treated as co

[Bug gas/23154] invalid register expression

2018-05-09 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23154 Baoshan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pangbw at gmail dot com -- You are

[Bug gas/23154] New: invalid register expression

2018-05-09 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pangbw at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- For assembly code: $ cat x.s addis %r5,%r1,2 addis %r5,%r0,2 addis 5,0,2 A warning will be emited for line 2 but not for line 1 and line 3: $ as -a32 -mppc

[Bug binutils/20984] New: different DOT value in the 'same' place

2016-12-20 Thread pangbw at gmail dot com
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: pangbw at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9708 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9708&action=edit linker script Steps to show the issue: 1. cat t.c