[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2009-03-11 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2009-03-11 10:08 --- Ping? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-11-19 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-11-19 13:51 --- So. relo has no longer executable flag set - for me this is ok from binutils point of view and the patch should be submitted. I think the problem why elflint still spotting that error is because .plt and

[Bug ld/5276] relax is not yet perfect. fails linking large c++

2007-11-09 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-11-09 11:56 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Can you verify that -fPIC or -mlarge-data is used: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/axp-list/2003-August/msg00039.html Only -fPIC is in use. No -msmall-data

[Bug ld/5276] relax is not yet perfect. fails linking large c++

2007-11-07 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-11-07 10:28 --- Nice try, but didn't work: ../../dist/lib/libgkcontentsvg_s.a(nsSVGScriptElement.o):/home/oliver/firefox/mozilla/content/svg/content/src/nsSVGScriptElement.cpp:194: relocation truncated to fit: GP

[Bug ld/5276] relax is not yet perfect. fails linking large c++

2007-11-07 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-11-07 08:18 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Can you try binutils 2.18? Yes. I just compiled binutils 2.18 and will try a new firefox build. Should be finished in a few hours :-) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzi

[Bug ld/5276] New: relax is not yet perfect. fails linking large c++

2007-11-06 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
Version: 2.17 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: oliver at linux-kernel dot at CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: alpha-redhat-linux GC

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-11-04 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-11-04 22:36 --- It still spots the same error: *** failure in ../src/addr2line loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable *** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh -- http://sourceware.org

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-11-04 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-11-04 12:50 --- What in your opinion would be the best way to verify it? elfutils still spot the same problem. So actually, you might have fixed the problem, but elfutils is still having a problem; Or: Your fix didn't

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-31 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-31 12:20 --- Will this fix be included in the next release? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-23 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-23 15:01 --- > What is wrong with GNU_RELRO? It could be an elfutils bug. If this looks fine for you then OK. I'll ask elfutils guys then. I just wanted to ask you if it looks OK for you, so I don't bug

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-23 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-23 14:27 --- Message spotted by elfutils is still the same of course: loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable *** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-23 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-23 14:25 --- I rebuilt binutils with your patch and elfutils still complains: [EMAIL PROTECTED] elfutils-0.130]$ eu-readelf -Sl libelf/libelf.so There are 37 section headers, starting at offset 0xd0ad0: Section Headers

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-23 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-23 07:48 --- > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00308.html Can you attach the patch here as well in a 'downloadable' format? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-22 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-22 08:12 --- You can find the mentioned tarball at the same location... -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-22 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-22 08:10 --- OK, then this should be what you need, right? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ tar tfvj elfutils-system-linker-input-files.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- root/root 1496 2007-07-31 23:10 usr/lib/crti.o -rw-r--r-- root/root

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-17 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-17 09:14 --- Please find the tarball of my elfutils 0.130 compiled on alpha here: http://filelister.linux-kernel.at/mod_perl?current=/share -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-17 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-17 08:59 --- (In reply to comment #13) > Created an attachment (id=2046) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2046&action=view) > make libelf.so with -Wl,-verbose and gcc -v Linker input

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-17 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-17 08:58 --- Created an attachment (id=2046) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2046&action=view) make libelf.so with -Wl,-verbose and gcc -v -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-16 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-16 09:13 --- With latest and greatest elfutils it has gone worse: loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable *** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh --- readelf.out 2007-10-16 11:00

[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug

2007-10-16 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
--- Additional Comments From oliver at linux-kernel dot at 2007-10-16 07:06 --- (In reply to comment #9) > *** Bug 5176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Oh well. My alpha bug is really the same as this sparc bug. :-) If anyone needs any input, let me know! -- h

[Bug ld/5176] New: elfutils don't pass testsuite on alpha

2007-10-15 Thread oliver at linux-kernel dot at
Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: oliver at linux-kernel dot at CC: bug-binutils at gnu do