--
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkl at pengutronix dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3206
--- You are receiving this
--- Additional Comments From mkl at pengutronix dot de 2006-09-07 20:02
---
This should answer my question :)
./as -march=ep9312 -mfloat-abi=hard -mfpu=maverick
^^
sleepy - marc
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3054
--- Additional Comments From mkl at pengutronix dot de 2006-09-07 20:00
---
Hi Nick!
GCC build with "--with-cpu=ep9312" works fine with binutils. Your argumentation
is clear to me, but what do the gcc guys think about that?
IMHO there should be a common sense between gcc an
--- Additional Comments From mkl at pengutronix dot de 2006-08-15 09:19
---
To be more specific:
the binutils cross-build is successful. the gcc cross-build fails...
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3054
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||r dot schwebel at
||pengutronix dot de
http://sourceware.org/bu
"arm-ep93xx_maverick-linux-gnueabi"
--with-sysroot=/opt/ptxdist-0.10.svn-mkl/arm-ep93xx_maverick-linux-gnueabi/gcc-4.1.1-glibc-2.4/sysroot-arm-ep93xx_maverick-linux-gnueabi
--
Summary: unknown architecture `ep9312'
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18
