https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #13 from Mike Lothian ---
Thanks, winecfg now loads
I notice desktop integration has stopped working, but I think that's the Plasma
6.3 release
I'll look into it
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #6 from Mike Lothian ---
Created attachment 15944
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15944&action=edit
64bit broken regedit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #5 from Mike Lothian ---
Created attachment 15943
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15943&action=edit
64bit working regedit
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #4 from Mike Lothian ---
Some do, some don't
Regedit for example doesn't
I'm attaching the 64bit binaries that work and don't work, it's the same with
the 32bit binaries
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
--- Comment #2 from Mike Lothian ---
No wine programs start, I can try and see if the internal programs from wine
start under windows
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32264
Mike Lothian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mike at fireburn dot co.uk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32675
Mike Lothian changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://bugs.winehq.org/sho
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: mike at fireburn dot co.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Removing ~/.wine and running winecfg
002c:fixme:actctx:parse_depend_manifests Could not find dependent assembly
L"Microsoft.Windows.Common-Controls"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #20 from Mike Lothian ---
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #16 from Mike Lothian ---
Looks good here
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #15 from Mike Lothian ---
I can confirm that that patch on top of 2.35.1 gets things working on 32bit
mingw
I'll test 64bit and regular Linux builds later this evening
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #13 from Mike Lothian ---
I'm not sure how to shrink the issue to a test case, but will happily test out
any patches on x86 x86_64 on native Linux and Mingw
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #10 from Mike Lothian ---
Equally reverting 041d1c2d4f03a134cb7574e4d62d2ce4418503ff from binutils-2_35_1
allows things to build again
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #9 from Mike Lothian ---
041d1c2d4f03a134cb7574e4d62d2ce4418503ff is the first bad commit
commit 041d1c2d4f03a134cb7574e4d62d2ce4418503ff
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #8 from Mike Lothian ---
Hi, not sure if I'll be able to make a test case. I have bisected between 2.34
and 2.35.1 and found this to be the bad commit:
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Wed Jul 22 03:49:07 2020 -0700
ld: Properly over
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #6 from Mike Lothian ---
Hi Nick
Yes it builds without LTO with bintuils 2.35.1
I'm using GCC 10.2, the version of GCC hasn't changed, it continues to build
just fine with LTO and binutils 2.34 if I downgrade
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #4 from Mike Lothian ---
I also rebuilt gcc with the batched bintuils, but the same still happens
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #3 from Mike Lothian ---
Created attachment 12870
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12870&action=edit
updated build.log
The DWARF messages have now gone, but the build still fails
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
--- Comment #1 from Mike Lothian ---
https://github.com/doitsujin/dxvk/issues/1782
https://bugs.gentoo.org/745372
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: mike at fireburn dot co.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 12869
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12869&action=edit
Build log
This worked fine with binutils 2.34, the 64bi
20 matches
Mail list logo
