[Bug binutils/20979] DLL relocation totally broken

2017-01-08 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979 --- Comment #6 from Linda Zhang --- Created attachment 9744 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9744&action=edit Patch for dllwrap OK I saw dllwrap is not maintained for 15 years. OMG! So I'd like to submit a patch to

[Bug binutils/20979] DLL relocation totally broken

2017-01-06 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979 --- Comment #5 from Linda Zhang --- (In reply to Linda Zhang from comment #4) > (In reply to Linda Zhang from comment #2) > > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > > > Hi Linda, > > > > > > > Binutils: 2.25.1 > > > > > > Have you trie

[Bug binutils/20979] DLL relocation totally broken

2017-01-06 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979 --- Comment #4 from Linda Zhang --- (In reply to Linda Zhang from comment #2) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > > Hi Linda, > > > > > Binutils: 2.25.1 > > > > Have you tried using a more recent version of the binutils ? We are

[Bug binutils/20979] DLL relocation totally broken

2017-01-06 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979 --- Comment #3 from Linda Zhang --- Created attachment 9742 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9742&action=edit Duplicate .reloc info -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. __

[Bug binutils/20979] DLL relocation totally broken

2017-01-06 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20979 --- Comment #2 from Linda Zhang --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Hi Linda, > > > Binutils: 2.25.1 > > Have you tried using a more recent version of the binutils ? We are > currently on release 2.27 and release 2.28 is about

[Bug binutils/20979] New: DLL relocation totally broken

2016-12-17 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: lindasc at qq dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 9707 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9707&action=edit minimal case for the DLL relocation bug OS: Win7 SP1 Toolchain: Mingw-w

[Bug ld/16887] Timestamp bug with Windows bound import technology

2014-05-01 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16887 --- Comment #1 from Linda Zhang --- Also the strip command will accidently erase the timestamp field of EXE/DLLs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bu

[Bug ld/16887] New: Timestamp bug with Windows bound import technology

2014-04-30 Thread lindasc at qq dot com
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: lindasc at qq dot com Created attachment 7569 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7569&action=edit a simple case There is a timestamp bug in ld 2.24. ld 2.24 introduced a new "featur