https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Matthias, is this still a problem? Could you provide steps to reproduce it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jremus at linux dot ibm.com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #21 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Rui Ueyama from comment #20)
> GCC 12 seems to always append `@PLT` to a function symbol even if we are not
> calling that function. Here is a test case.
...
> I think `larl %r1,foo@PLT` sh
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #19 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Rui Ueyama from comment #18)
> Was there any reason to limit it to R_390_64 and R_390_PC32DBL?
These were the only relocs which made sense to me as 64 bit pointers.
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #17 from Andreas Krebbel ---
I have attached a patch for the testcase in Comment 14. Turns out that we also
have to zero out the symbol value in order to avoid function pointer references
in the main binary to be wired up to the ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 14386
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14386&action=edit
Experimental Fix
This patch fixes the testcase from comment 14. No testsuite regressions in the
Binuti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel ---
So do I understand it correctly that for the Qt case the example would look
more like this:
test2.c:
#include
void alias () __attribute__ ((weak, alias ("bar")));
void bar() { printf("bar=%p alias=%
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to Rui Ueyama from comment #5)
> Ooh, that's why I did see this only on SuSE's builder. I'm glad that that's
> already been handled.
I would just like to mention that adding the @PLT isn't rea
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29655
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to maamountki from comment #10)
> (In reply to Andreas Krebbel from comment #8)
>
> > For S/390 it would mean that non of the existing linker scripts
> > would continue to work with Gold afte
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to maamountki from comment #7)
> Thinking of replacing the new layout with this one
>
> +--+
> |.got[0]: DYNAMIC | <--- _GLOBAL_O
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to maamountki from comment #6)
...
> Yes I do and it does not.
> .got and .got.plt must be set properly in linker srcript to get it work
> otherwise a segmentation fault will be produced. I can
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to maamountki from comment #4)
Looks good to me. However, I'm not a Gold maintainer.
One difference to the ld implementation is that you appear to always use the
new got layout. ld uses the ne
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113
--- Comment #19 from Andreas Krebbel ---
(In reply to maamountki from comment #18)
> *patch
>
> I just noticed that SEPARATE_GOTPLT is duplicated in the 64 bit script and
> partial relro support is already implemented so yes my patch should b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113
--- Comment #14 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Maamoun,
was your patch ever posted on the Binutils mailing list? I could not find it
there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20114
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Unfortunately the patch also went into 2.32 release :(
At least for 64 bit the patch doesn't hurt since it is a nop. The code
currently looks like:
EXTRA_EM_FILE=s390
SEPARATE_GOTPLT=24 <--- the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20113
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at linux dot ibm.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
