https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134
--- Comment #2 from kloczek ---
Correction when --enaable-warn-execstack
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134
kloczek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|2.41: build fails with |2.41: build fails with
|-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31134
--- Comment #1 from kloczek ---
Looks like DEFAULT_LD_ERROR_EXECSTACK is defined only when
--disable-error-rwx-segments is used.
[tkloczko@pers-jacek ld]$ grep -r DEFAULT_LD_ERROR_EXECSTACK
emultempl/elf.em: link_info.error_execstack = DEFAU
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Looks like ld build fails when source tree is configured with
--enable-warn-execstack
make[4]: Entering directory '/home/tkloczko/rpmbuild/BUILD/binutils
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
binutils-2.37-9.fc36.x86_64 from rawhide
efivar from master https://github.com/rhboot/efivar/
When LTO is used gcc crashes
make[1]: Entering directory
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25061
--- Comment #8 from kloczek ---
Despite fact that elfutils now builds with LTO and it passes test suite I have
no time now to test results of my build :(
(maybe at begin of the next week).
Nevertheless thank you very much for help :)
--
You
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Few weeks ago when I've started experimenting with LTO I've started not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25063
--- Comment #3 from kloczek ---
Easiest way to solve issue with downloading tar ball from release tag would be
upgrade git frontend to latest cgit ot gitlab interface which provides OOTB
possibility to download compressed or not archive from t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25063
--- Comment #1 from kloczek ---
Just checked again and despite fact that 2.33 is already tagged in the git
still there is no dist tar ball on https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list fo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25061
--- Comment #7 from kloczek ---
Yes that it is still 2.32.
Can someone upload dist tar ball to https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/ ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Looks like binutils 2.33 have been released and tagged but dist tar ball have
not been uploaded to https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils/
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25061
--- Comment #4 from kloczek ---
BTW just found that rawhide binutils fails on LTO linking latest glib2.
$ coredumpctl gdb 2479190
PID: 2479190 (ld)
UID: 1000 (tkloczko)
GID: 1000 (tkloczko)
Signal: 11
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25061
--- Comment #3 from kloczek ---
2.33 branch or release?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: kloczko.tomasz at gmail dot com
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Fedora rawhide.
libxml++ 3.0.1 + git patches with LTO causes sigsegv.
Tested that
14 matches
Mail list logo
