https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #34 from Kaylee ---
I'm getting several failures:
> FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (-z nosectionheader, none)
> FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (PIE, -z nosectionheader, none)
> FAIL: Build pr22393-2 (-z nosectionheader, objcopy)
> FAIL: Build pr223
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #39 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12359
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12359&action=edit
testcase for GNU_PROPERTY_NO_COPY_ON_PROTECTED segfault
The attached file exports an `int foo`, linking against
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #35 from Kaylee ---
There are a couple of typos in the comments: "symbol stable", "string stable",
and "memory chekers".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #38 from Kaylee ---
> How can I reproduce it? Do they fail on master branch?
Yeah, they fail on master for me.
Additionally, I've just found out that ld segfaults when trying to link against
a shared object with GNU_PROPERTY_NO_C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #31 from Kaylee ---
Yep, I'm not getting the warning with the new version.
Also the test case that I mentioned failed appears to be
ld/testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr17618.d, which I think is probably unrelated.
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #28 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12358
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12358&action=edit
test case for note warning
This is a testcase for the warning about no note section. I think any shared
library
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #27 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12357
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12357&action=edit
testcase for objcopy breakage
This .so works fine, but if put through objcopy (even without flags), objcopy
wil
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #24 from Kaylee ---
Apologies, with the new objcopy version it isn't generating overlapping PT_LOAD
entries, though it is still modifying them and moving the program header.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #23 from Kaylee ---
I got a failure in the ld testsuite in x86-64.exp. Unfortunately, about an hour
later, my computer crashed, and I have since been unable to reproduce it. I
think the text was something like "RELATIVE RELOCATION
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #20 from Kaylee ---
Works for me now!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #18 from Kaylee ---
I get uninitialised variable usage errors when I try to build it, in this
section of elf_link_is_defined_archive_symbol():
> if (elf_bad_symtab (abfd))
> {
> extsymcount = symcount;
> extsymof
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #16 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12348
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12348&action=edit
patch to add test for -z nosectionheader
This patch adds the test for it, based against your branch.
--
You a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #14 from Kaylee ---
The information on the number of symbols in the symbol table is available in
DT_HASH->nchain, as the chain table parallels the symbol table.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for t
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #10 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12343
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12343&action=edit
patch to add flag to not emit the section header table to the BFD-based ld
I'll add a testcase shortly.
--
Yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #9 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12342
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12342&action=edit
patch to add BFD support for not emitting the section header table
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
Kaylee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #12336|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #8 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12341
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12341&action=edit
patch to add a test for the flag
This adds some testing for the flag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #5 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12336
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12336&action=edit
patch to add flag to not emit section header tables
I've written a small patch to add such a flag, does this loo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #3 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12332
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12332&action=edit
testcase with only shstrtab
This testcase has a minimal section header table containing only `.shstrtab`.
This w
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25617
--- Comment #2 from Kaylee ---
Created attachment 12331
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12331&action=edit
testcase with no section headers
This test case has no section headers; gold immediately errors due to
attemptin
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: klkblake at gmail dot com
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
For shared objects, all information needed for linking is in the
21 matches
Mail list logo
