--- Additional Comments From jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com
2010-08-28 16:13 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> Can you at least tell me the vendor?
Dialogic.
> Patch at
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2010-08/msg00360.html
Appli
--- Additional Comments From jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com
2010-08-28 11:41 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> What toolchain produced DivaP? I'm asking because the headers are not
> consistent.
I don't know. This binary comes from the vendor. There could be oth
--- Additional Comments From jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com
2010-08-28 01:08 ---
*** Bug 11954 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com
2010-08-28 01:08 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11953 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: jeff dot chua dot linux at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: build-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourc
