[Bug binutils/10223] libbfd returns messed up data (symbol->section == 0x109 or other strange values)

2009-06-04 Thread ich at az2000 dot de
--- Additional Comments From ich at az2000 dot de 2009-06-04 17:23 --- Thanks a lot, that was the problem. It seems that I had left an old bfd.h in /usr/local/includes and all system build scripts (Gentoo Portage) used that one instead of the one in /usr/include. Removing the file from

[Bug binutils/10223] libbfd returns messed up data (symbol->section == 0x109 or other strange values)

2009-06-01 Thread ich at az2000 dot de
--- Additional Comments From ich at az2000 dot de 2009-06-01 14:19 --- To be more exact, this is with binutils-2.19.1. I also tried binutils-2.18 and have some very similar behaviour there. (You can see more details in the oprofile bug report.) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla

[Bug binutils/10223] New: libbfd returns messed up data (symbol->section == 0x109 or other strange values)

2009-06-01 Thread ich at az2000 dot de
other strange values) Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: ich at az2000 dot de CC: bu