https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16169|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed on master branch so far.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16171|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #17)
> Indeed, my proposed patch is not addressing the issue, tests fail. Your
> patch does work.
Should I submit my patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #7)
> The patch works. Thanks a lot for your help.
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-July/142577.html
--
You are receiving this mail be
||
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16173
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16173&action=edit
A patch
Try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16172
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16172&action=edit
A patch to move gas_sframe_check to binutils-common.exp
Together with this:
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-plugi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16169|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16168|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|indu.bhagat at oracle dot com |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16167|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"ld -r" is broken with |"ld -r" doesn't remove the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$
/export/build/gnu/tools-build/binutils/build-x86_64-linux/binutils/readelf -rW
eh-group.o
Relocation section '.rela.eh_frame' at offset 0x2f8 contains 1 entry:
Offset Info
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"ld -r" is broken with |"ld -r" is broken with
|-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|'FAIL: Link eh-group.o to |"ld -r" is broken with
|e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16167
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16167&action=edit
A testcase
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 tmp]$
/export/build/gnu/tools-build/binutils/build-x86_64-linux/binutils/readelf
--sf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
I can reproduce it with binutils configured with
.../configure --enable-plugins --disable-gdb --disable-gdbserver
--disable-libbacktrac
e --disable-libdecnumber --disable-readline --disable-sim
--enable-default
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: fweimer at redhat dot com
Depends on: 33129, 31372
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86-64
GNU2 TLS binary may not work on Linux without the GNU2 TLS run-time
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33119
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33119
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16155
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16155&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33119
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|strip: broken symbol|strip: broken symbol
|ind
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33050
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
|1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16145
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16145&action=edit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33050
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16145|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26675
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33078
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33075
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33078
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16135|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33078
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #2)
> We had a report of this as well but I wasn't sure if it was a bug. These
> jumps happen with new relocation types at least.
Please open a new bug report if it isn't the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|"pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is |"pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is
ponent: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Target: i386
sysdeps/i386/start.S has
# ifdef SHARED
pushl main@GOT(%ebx)
# else
linker relaxed it to
22c: e9 cf ff ff ff jmp200
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #12)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #11)
> > Created attachment 16093 [details]
> > The final patch
> >
> > This is the final patch.
>
> This patch applies code tra
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16097|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16096|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #25)
> Created attachment 16096 [details]
> A patch to add .pushuniqsect
>
> Please retry with .pushuniqsect.
Jan proposed to use --sectname-subst. Does it work for you?
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16095|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16087|0 |1
is obsolete|
2025 at 07:15:14AM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com
> > > wrote:
> > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
> > > >
> > > > --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
> > > > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #7)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32967
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32967
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
CC: sam at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3 pr21479]$ cat a.c
extern void foo1(void);
void foo2(void) { foo1(); }
void foo3(void) {}
[hjl@gnu-tgl-3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16090|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16089|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16088|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #5)
> > > When compiler sees a hidden undefined symbol, it assumes that
> > > it is defined somewhere else and it isn't an ABS symbo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #18)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > > > Created attachment 16086 [de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #5)
> > When compiler sees a hidden undefined symbol, it assumes that
> > it is defined somewhere else and it isn't an ABS symbol. As
> > the result, you won't get 0x2a.
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16086|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #15)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > Created attachment 16086 [details]
> > A new patch
> >
> > Please use this one.
>
> I tested the latest patch here togeth
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #0)
> > > $ grep . exe.c lib.c lib.lds
> > > exe.c:extern void lib_func(void);
> > >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16084|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #12)
> Hi H.J.,
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:15:14AM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #9)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #7)
> > > And, the GCC version I used is 14.2.0, which will generate per function
> > >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16083|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #7)
> And, the GCC version I used is 14.2.0, which will generate per function
> section of "__patchable_function_entries". Thanks!
Now, the question is if GCC should generat
||2025-05-13
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16082
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16082&action=edit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #2)
> Thanks H.J. for the comments!
>
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #0)
> > >
> > > If all above is correct, could we cons
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16082|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #0)
>
> If all above is correct, could we consider below two options?
>
> 1. Add a new type of ".pushsection", say, ".pushnewsection", which will
> always create a new secti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25749
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||32443
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourceware
||25749
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed||2025-05-10
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #0)
> Crea
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Also fixed on 2.43 and 2.44 branches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #13)
> For the non-fat case, we get:
>
> a.c
> ```
> extern void foo1(void);
> void foo2(void) { foo1(); }
> void foo3(void) {}
> ```
>
> b.c:
> ```
> extern void foo2(void
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16068|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16067|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16066|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16065|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16064|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32927
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32927
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16060
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16060&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32927
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
This is the current patch:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-April/140767.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fche at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32926
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #14)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> > Created attachment 16054 [details]
> > A patch
> >
> > Please try this one on the current master branch.
>
> It se
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16054|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16053|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #10)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > > > (In reply to Matt
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #8)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #5)
> > > I think that this proposed patch could allow putting the PT_TLS s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #5)
> I think that this proposed patch could allow putting the PT_TLS segment
> offset past the end of the file (that I think was a problem in
> https://sourceware.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #3)
> HJ's patch looks good except that the new test fails for me..
What is your target?
> Also the comment needs tweaking. I'd suggest something like:
>
>
|WAITING
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Last reconfirmed||2025-04-27
Version|unspecified |2.45 (HEAD)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16053
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16053&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32846
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-April/140473.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1 - 100 of 2403 matches
Mail list logo
