Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/blob/6ef74a3985befe3cb07a64d089ff00694f4674dd/ld/ldmain.c#L425
i think
timeradd (& pd->use.ru_stime, &
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32871
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32466
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains_build/binutils-gdb/sim/common/nrun.c:150:23: error:
assignment to 'void (*)(void)' from incompatible pointer type '__sighandler_t'
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains_build/binutils-gdb/readline/readline/terminal.c:803:7:
error: too many arguments to function 'tputs'
803 | tputs (_rl_
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Windows has no sys/ipc.h and i use --enable-targets=all to build all targets
for binutils. The don't work.
/home
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32250
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32243
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 15732
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15732&action=edit
patch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32244
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
--
You are
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
It is so frustrating that strip is not cross platform. A lot of GCC and
binutils have issues with make install-strip. I have to use llvm-strip instead.
Any
||euloanty at live dot com
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
/home/csrg/toolchains_build/binutils-gdb/binutils/dlltool.c: In function
'main':
/home/csrg/toolch
Component: gold
Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target Milestone: ---
checking for library containing dlsym... none required
configure: error: "unsupported target loongarch64-unknown-elf&qu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15606|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31962
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #25 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 15608
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15608&action=edit
just exclude all things here
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31962
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
; else if (bfd_link_pie (&link_info)
&& link_info.separate_code) return
; else if (bfd_link_pie (&link_info)) return
are you kidding me?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31962
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 15607
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15607&action=edit
what's going on here?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31962
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
looks like a musl only issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
||euloanty at live dot com
Host||x86_64-linux-musl
Build||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
iority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
eelf_x86_64.c: In function 'gldelf_x86_64_get_script':
eelf_x86_64.c:2692:42: error: 'return' with no value, in function returning
non-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #24 from cqwrteur ---
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains_build/binutils-gdb/gprofng/src/Experiment.cc:234:12:
error: 'fopen64' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'open64'?
234 | fh = fopen64 (fname, NTXT ("r"));
|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #23 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #22)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #15)
> > See gprofng/configure.ac:175 which sets _MUSL_LIBC.
>
> it does not really work out. a lot of things are not defined like
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #22 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #15)
> See gprofng/configure.ac:175 which sets _MUSL_LIBC.
it does not really work out. a lot of things are not defined like fopen64,
fstat64. you really should not use the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #21 from cqwrteur ---
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains_build/binutils-gdb/gprofng/src/../../include/libiberty.h:112:14:
error: conflicting declaration of C function 'char* basename(const char*)'
112 | extern char *basename (const char *
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #20 from cqwrteur ---
eelf_x86_64.c: In function 'gldelf_x86_64_get_script':
eelf_x86_64.c:2692:42: error: 'return' with no value, in function returning
non-void [-Wreturn-mismatch]
2692 | && link_info.separate_code)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15605|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #18 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #16)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #15)
> > See gprofng/configure.ac:175 which sets _MUSL_LIBC.
>
> it does not set it for me.
patch still not working out
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #17 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 15605
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15605&action=edit
correct patch
i have put a patch here.
This is exactly the reason why musl libc is a crap. Everyone should j
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #16 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #15)
> See gprofng/configure.ac:175 which sets _MUSL_LIBC.
it does not set it for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #14 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #13)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #12)
> > *** Bug 31960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> This patch is WRONG.
>
>
> there is no __musl__ relat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779
--- Comment #13 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #12)
> *** Bug 31960 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
This patch is WRONG.
there is no __musl__ related macros in musl libc. musl does not want you to
dete
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #5)
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #4)
> > Dupe.
> >
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 30779 ***
>
> what? it is not resolved for me why?
i am u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains_build/binutils-gdb/gprofng/libcollector/iotrace.c:3005:16:
error: redefinition of 'fgetpos'
3005 | DCL_FGETPOS64 (fgetpos64)
|^
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 15604
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15604&action=edit
stderr failure
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 15603
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15603&action=edit
config
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31960
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||x86_64-linux-musl
Target|
)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
musl failure
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31930
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31930
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Build||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Host|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31930
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
/home/cqwrteur/toolchains/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/x86_64-w64-mingw32/x86_64-w64-mingw32/bin/as:
BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.42.50.20240626 assertion fail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31796
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
I think the problem is caused by:
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/blob/78726a8b7cbe45e6197169580ea304fc2ea647da/gas/config/obj-coff-seh.c#L927
This function may be wrong?
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31796
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 15533
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15533&action=edit
bugged asm
$ aarch64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c a.s
a.s: Assembler messages:
a.s:19: Internal error in write_function_
||euloanty at live dot com
Host||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Target||aarch64-w64-mingw32
Version|unspecified |2.43 (HEAD)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
aarch64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c a.c
/tmp/ccBPN4vQ.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccBPN4vQ.s:19: Internal error in write_function_pdata at
/home/cqwrteur
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #42 from cqwrteur ---
*** Bug 30375 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #17 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14898
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14898&action=edit
English translation
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #16 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14897
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14897&action=edit
Someone has found the problem here
Someone has found the problem here.
std::cout does not bind correctly for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #15 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14896
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14896&action=edit
He found that ld binds std::cout to the address of std::cout in the dll
Why is this .refptr?? It should be ju
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #14 from cqwrteur ---
Some one tries this program:
#include
#include
#include
#include
typedef void* (__cdecl* fn_type_t)(void* self, char const* string);
int main()
{
MessageBoxA(nullptr,"pause",nullptr,0);
a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #13 from cqwrteur ---
.text:000140001588 ; === S U B R
O U T I N E ===
.text:000140001588
.text:000140001588 ;
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #12 from cqwrteur ---
Ida pro result for GNU ld. I do not see jmp instruction here.
.text:000140001540 ; === S U B R
O U T I N E ===
.text:0001
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #11 from cqwrteur ---
Here is the disassembly result from IDA pro.
.text:000140001540 ; === S U B R
O U T I N E ===
.text:000140001540
.text:000
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #10 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14895
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14895&action=edit
ld no link
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14894
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14894&action=edit
ld no link
ld no link 1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #8 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14893
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14893&action=edit
lld has link from text section that jmps here while ld does not
lld has link from text section that jmps here
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #7 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14892
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14892&action=edit
executable
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14891
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14891&action=edit
ld missing import of ios_base_library_init
I use lld and it imports one more symbol than ld.
I guess it is th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #5 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> Does this problem still occur after my patch for pr30343?
Please fix this asap. I have reported this for half a year and it is still
unfixed. This breaks basically ev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #2)
> (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> > Does this problem still occur after my patch for pr30343?
>
> Yes, it still occurs. Just crashing for hello world.
30375
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #4 from cqwrteur ---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
--- Comment #2 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> Does this problem still occur after my patch for pr30343?
Yes, it still occurs. Just crashing for hello world.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||29973
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourcewar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||30375
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourcewar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives |C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
--- Comment #1 from cqwrteur ---
6156746547736C54 is clearly not a possible address.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32
--
You are receiving t
IRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
struct foo
{
foo()
{
__builtin_puts("hello\n");
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||euloanty at live dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
Severity|normal
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: euloanty at live dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Bug issue 29973 was a mess. So I decided to start a new one and close bug
29973.
GCC 13 made several changes to iostream, including making it with an
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #40 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32)
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So
> please could you check a couple of things for me ?
>
> 1. Does iostream.ex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #39 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14)
> Well I have just tried x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ from Fedora rawhide (which is
> based on gcc version 12) and I still cannot reproduce the problem. So I am
> beginni
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #38 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32)
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So
> please could you check a couple of things for me ?
>
> 1. Does iostream.ex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #37 from cqwrteur ---
jwakely do you think it is caused by __init_priority__ ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #36 from cqwrteur ---
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/ec59848074ba8c4310cbadb603822bfaeff03a32
See this
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #35 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32)
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So
> please could you check a couple of things for me ?
>
> 1. Does iostream.ex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #34 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #33)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32)
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So
> > please could you check a co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #33 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32)
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So
> please could you check a couple of things for me ?
>
> 1. Does iostream.ex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #30 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24)
> Created attachment 14656 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Oops - I forgot about section names containing the $ character.
>
> Please could you try out
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #28 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24)
> Created attachment 14656 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Oops - I forgot about section names containing the $ character.
>
> Please could you try out
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #29 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14666
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14666&action=edit
This is my build script
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #27 from cqwrteur ---
Created attachment 14659
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14659&action=edit
iostream
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #26 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #25)
> (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24)
> > Created attachment 14656 [details]
> > Proposed patch
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Oops - I forgot about section names conta
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #25 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24)
> Created attachment 14656 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Oops - I forgot about section names containing the $ character.
>
> Please could you try out
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #22 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #21)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20)
> > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18)
> > > Created attachment 14652 [details]
> > > Proposed patch
> > >
> > > Inte
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #23 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #22)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #21)
> > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20)
> > > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18)
> > > > Created attachment 14652
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
