[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-12-11 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2009-12-11 17:48 --- Subject: Re: Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 05:25:25PM -, chris at seberino dot org wrote: > I don't think the following is UNPREDICTABLE. Every load a

[Bug ld/10302] ld merging smaller strings into larger strings?

2009-06-19 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2009-06-19 21:13 --- Subject: Re: New: ld merging smaller strings into larger strings? On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 08:59:39PM -, ianw at vmware dot com wrote: > I'm quite unsure why the final def is merged o

[Bug ld/3191] Dwarf 2 reader in linker doesn't suppor DW_FORM_ref_addr

2008-09-08 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2008-09-08 23:31 --- I've checked in a version of HJ's patch. But I can't work out what the problem is in this long bug report, so I'm not sure if it's fixed now. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug ld/6761] abbrev_offset in DWARF2 info is set incorrectly (zero) by ld

2008-07-25 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2008-07-25 16:00 --- Subject: Re: abbrev_offset in DWARF2 info is set incorrectly (zero) by ld On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 03:12:17PM -, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > The problem with GDB has two parts. Firstly the c

[Bug ld/6468] ld: --export-dynamic fails if no undefined symbols

2008-04-29 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2008-04-29 20:51 --- Subject: Re: ld: --export-dynamic fails if no undefined symbols On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 08:46:30PM -, jreiser at BitWagon dot com wrote: > is the software itself, but I could find no indication

[Bug ld/6468] ld: --export-dynamic fails if no undefined symbols

2008-04-29 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2008-04-29 19:48 --- Subject: Re: ld: --export-dynamic fails if no undefined symbols On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:54:37PM -, jreiser at BitWagon dot com wrote: > [Did I cover everything that should be changd? ;-)] W

[Bug ld/6468] ld: --export-dynamic fails if no undefined symbols

2008-04-29 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2008-04-29 18:14 --- Subject: Re: New: ld: --export-dynamic fails if no undefined symbols On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 05:59:42PM -, jreiser at BitWagon dot com wrote: > If there are no undefined symbols then there is no Dyna

[Bug ld/5207] man page of ld: hashstyle=both missing

2007-11-07 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2007-11-07 22:29 --- Subject: Re: man page of ld: hashstyle=both missing On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:06:27PM -, mohringarmin at hotmail dot de wrote: > I have binutils version 2.18 installed. > Version of man pages is 2.67

[Bug gas/5038] Error: Unrecognized token 'mod'

2007-09-17 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2007-09-17 16:42 --- Subject: Re: Error: Unrecognized token 'mod' On Sun, Sep 16, 2007 at 08:04:04PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote: > mod is a special token for % in Intel mode, similar to AND, OR, XOR, NOT, D

[Bug ld/4928] Linker should check code sequence before TLS optimization

2007-08-16 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2007-08-16 13:19 --- Subject: Re: Linker should check code sequence before TLS optimization On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 01:08:34PM -, hjl at lucon dot org wrote: > 1. Those sequences may not be optimal in all cases. If compi

[Bug ld/4538] static initialization ignored in static archive (.a)

2007-05-23 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2007-05-23 12:20 --- Subject: Re: static initialization ignored in static archive (.a) On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:20:04AM -, ejt at andrew dot cmu dot edu wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but the archive format is

[Bug binutils/2467] "ar q" gives quadratic memory use

2006-03-16 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2006-03-17 03:18 --- Subject: Re: "ar q" gives quadratic memory use On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 12:46:53AM -, dcoutts at gentoo dot org wrote: > This problem with ranlib/ar memory consumption is made worse by the fact that

[Bug ld/2362] SH: Hidden symbol in DSO does not be forced local

2006-03-02 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2006-02-24 14:28 --- Subject: Re: New: SH: Hidden symbol in DSO does not be forced local On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 01:08:46AM -, sugioka at itonet dot co dot jp wrote: > On sh4-unknown-linux target, hidden symbol in DSO does not

[Bug ld/2143] Unresolvable reference by DSO to hidden symbol despite --allow-shlib-undefined

2006-01-18 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2006-01-18 14:52 --- Subject: Re: New: Unresolvable reference by DSO to hidden symbol despite --allow-shlib-undefined On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:40:56AM -, jan dot echternach at group-technologies dot com wrote: > I'm g

[Bug binutils/1343] need --with-lib-path = $exec_prefix for ld

2005-09-14 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2005-09-14 15:38 --- Subject: Re: New: need --with-lib-path = $exec_prefix for ld On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:29:45PM -, russfink at hotmail dot com wrote: > I compiled a binutils for a custom target, and specified "./c

[Bug binutils/1312] LD outputting huge files.

2005-09-12 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2005-09-12 18:44 --- Subject: Re: LD outputting huge files. On Mon, Sep 12, 2005 at 06:08:59PM -, TheMoken at gmail dot com wrote: > >From looking at the dump, it appears that I need to add a .rodata section to > >

[Bug ld/1040] Many packages fail to compile with binutils 2.16.1 because of ldscripts screwup

2005-07-01 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2005-07-01 13:44 --- Subject: Re: New: Many packages fail to compile with binutils 2.16.1 because of ldscripts screwup On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:40:07AM -, funtoos at yahoo dot com wrote: > With binutils 2.16.1, lots of packa

[Bug ld/993] fail to link if address of libc function taken in n64

2005-06-06 Thread drow at false dot org
--- Additional Comments From drow at false dot org 2005-06-07 03:33 --- Subject: Re: New: fail to link if address of libc function taken in n64 On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:00:41PM -, shay_gal-on at pmc-sierra dot com wrote: > Fails with "assertion fail" when trying