https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
yes, this seems to be fixed, at least with trunk 20240309.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
this testcase
W: [ld-elf/elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): PR ld/29072 (warn about abs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31101
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
why not make the test case more robust?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
CC||doko at debian dot org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
CC||doko at debian dot org
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32491
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabi
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
these fail with trunk 20241221 on arm-linux-gnueabi*, it looks like in some
cases these succeed, then fail in subsequent
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
yes, afaicr, the .rodata segments were the culprit. I don't have any arm32
specific patches. we are building with -mthumb by default (GCC configured with
--with-mode=thumb). I'll ask people to provide
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbeulich at suse dot com
--
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32435
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.44 Regression] gas |[2.44 Regression] gas
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15828
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15828&action=edit
test case
seen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32392
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-linux-gnu
--
You are receiving
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20241126 on i686-linux-gnu:
../../../gprofng/libcollector/libcol_util.c: In function
‘__collector_util_init
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32356
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Status|WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32356
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
this is not about a dropped symbol, but a replaced one:
CallStackP::add_stack_java_epilogue(DataDescriptor*, long, FramePacket*, long
long, unsigned int, Vector*, Vector*, bool)
CallStackP::add_stack_ja
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
building binutils from the trunk shows missing symbols compared to 2.43. If
that is intended, then probably the soname should be bumped on the trunk.
+#MISSING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
--- Comment #12 from Matthias Klose ---
sorry, I didn't mention the architectures. It fails on aarch64-linux-gnu,
arm-linux-gnueabihf, arm-linux-gnueabi, alpha-linux-gnu, powerpc-linux-gnu and
sparc64-linux-gnu. Other architectures work ok, se
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
--- Comment #10 from Matthias Klose ---
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/aarch64-linux-gnu/14/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none
OFFLOAD_TARGET_DEFAULT=1
Target: aarch64-linux-gnu
Con
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
--- Comment #9 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 15688
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15688&action=edit
log of the build
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
fails with
/usr/bin/ld: /tmp/ccijjp3k.ltrans5.ltrans.o: in function
`StaticDisplayConfig_nonexistent_config_file_is_no_error_Test::TestBody()':
/usr/src/mir-2.14.1-7/tests/miral/static_display_config.cpp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32003
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31982
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
when building with 14, I get different issues:
/usr/bin/ld:
CMakeFiles/mir_unit_tests.dir/frontend_wayland/test_desktop_file_manager.cpp.o:
in function
`DesktopFileManager_can_resolve_from_valid_flatpak_
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
the trunk (upcoming 2.43) fails to link an LTO enabled build, which succeeded
to link with 2.42. The failure is architecture independent
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Host|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Andreas.Krebbel at de dot
ibm.com
-
: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seeing this on the 2.42 branch. did't see this building gcc-12 or gcc-13 cross
compilers, howeve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
rebuilding did "fix" it. However you have to rebuild gdc-11 first (the last
gdc not requiring gdc to build) to build newer gdc versions. Is it worth
fixing this on older binutils branches?
--
You are
tatus: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15239
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15239&
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2 42 Regression] d21 (D|[2.42 Regression] d21 (D
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31110
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv64-linux-gnu
CC
)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
d21 (D frontend from GCC 13) fails to link with binutils trunk on
riscv64-linux-gnu, while this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
these are committed to GCC trunk, not yet to the gcc-13 branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
these are committed to GCC trunk, not yet to the gcc-13 branch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
the combined build is using GCC 13.2.0 and binutils 2.41
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
the combined build is using GCC 13.2.0 and binutils 2.41
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the current 2.41 branch, gprofng is not built and installed in a
combined binutils+gcc build, even if the combined build
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
the workaround is to copy the shared libsframe library to the destination
before calling the install target.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libsframe
Assignee: indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
this is seen with the current 2.41 branch, a combined binutils+gcc build fails
to install (libbfd installed before
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31102
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.42 Regression] pr18841 |[2.42 Regression] Build
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31102
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
trunk 20231125 fails tests on x86_64-linux-gnux32, succeeding with the 2.41
branch:
Test results, compared with installed binutils:
W
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31101
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||loongarch64-linux-gnu
--
You are re
: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
20231125 trunk, nopic link exec test fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu, succeeds
with the 2.41 branch:
Test results, compared with
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31100
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv64-linux-gnu
--
You are receiv
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20231125 on riscv64-linux-gnu. Succeeds with the 2.41 branch:
Test results, compared with installed binutils:
I: [gas
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #11 from Matthias Klose ---
that patch fixes the issue for me
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
these are the current Debian and Ubuntu development versions.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
$ nm -D /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 | grep pthread_create
00088580 T pthread_create@GLIBC_2.2.5
00088580 T pthread_create@@GLIBC_2.34
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
$ nm -D /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
w __cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.2.5
A GLIBC_2.11
A GLIBC_2.12
A GLIBC_2.18
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
$ nm /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0
nm: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0: no symbols
glibc 2.37, there is no libpthread.so anymore.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are o
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.41 branch:
gprofng(1) says:
The man pages for the various gprofng commands are not available yet,
but the --help option
supported on each of the commands
|remap-inputs causes build |introducing remap-inputs
|failure in edk2 |causes build failure in
||edk2
CC||doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30578
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30607
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||macro at orcam dot me.uk,
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
several regressions were introduced on the trunk between 20230611 and 20230622
for two mipsen targets, 30 on mipsel-linux-gnu and 106 on
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30602
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
independent of --enable-pgo-build=lto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30602
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-linux-gnu
CC|
: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
the gp-archive.exp hangs when run on i686-linux-gnu, top shows the a.out
process at 100%, not terminating.
Running target unix
Using /usr/share/dejagnu/baseboards
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30447
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
I see these with and without --enable-pgo-build=lto
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seeing a few regressions on the trunk, compared to 2.40, introduced between
20230501 and 20230510:
W: [binutils-all/objdump.exp] REGRESSION
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29940
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--
You are
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20221101 on arm-linux-gnueabihf, these tests fail compared to
the 2.39 branch:
W: [ld-arm/arm-elf.exp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29739
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-linux-gnueabihf
--
You are rece
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.39 branch and the trunk,
the gprofng build writes the file gprofng/doc/version.texi into the srcdir
instead
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20221004 on riscv64-linux-gnu, succeeding with 2.39
Running /<>/gas/testsuite/gas/riscv/riscv.exp ...
FAIL: gas
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
forwarded from https://bugs.debian.org/960686
That "gibberish" name is an internal name used in objcopy and it makes
more se
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen on a multiarch Linux system (Debian / Ubuntu):
https://bugs.debian.org/1016725
It looks like the *only* way to find the plugin directory is the configuration
file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29369
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
no, I also updated the compiler once.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29369
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen when linking python3.11 beta4 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu. The link is a lto
link, together with -fprofile-generate
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29369
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
my last successful build was on 20220707, the only changes in the gprofng
subdir is the generated configure file.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29338
--- Comment #5 from Matthias Klose ---
building in a separate builddir, configuring with
../configure --with-sysroot=/ \
--libdir=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu \
--disable-silent-rules --enable-obsolete --e
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with the 2.39 branch 20220713:
In file included from ../../../gprofng/src/../../include/demangle.h:32,
from
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29365
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[2.29/2.30 Regression] |[2.39/2.40 Regression]
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
reported as https://bugs.debian.org/1014842
$ adequate "$pkg"
libgprofng0:amd64: undefined-symbol
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgprofng.so.0.0.0 => p
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
a profiled lto GCC build:
- configure with -with-build-config=bootstrap-lto-lean
- build with: make profiledbootstrap
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
it depends which *1 executable is built first.
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/610456289/buildlog_ubuntu-kinetic-arm64.gcc-11_11.3.0-4ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
has failures in f951 and go1,
https://launchp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose ---
caused by 90b7a5df152a64d2bea20beb438e8b81049a5c30 and
4fb55bf6a9606eb7b626c30a9f4e71d6c2d4fbb2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maskray at google dot com
--
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
also reported as https://gcc.gnu.org/PR106145
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-linux-gnu
--
You are receiv
utils
Version: 2.39 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with binutils trunk 20220629 building GCC 10, 11, 12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at debian dot org
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose ---
trunk 20220527 still fails to build, this time with:
../../../gprofng/src/Experiment.cc: In member function ‘void
Experiment::write_header()’:
../../../gprofng/src/Experiment.cc:4139:33: error: cannot co
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29191
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
i.e. it ends up in /usr/etc, but should be /etc when configured with
--sysconfdir=/etc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
gprofng.rc is installed into
dbe_DATA = $(srcdir)/gprofng.rc
while it probably should be installed into the sysconfdir, which can be
specified by the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
seen with trunk 20220512 on x86_64-linux-gnux32:
libtool: compile: x86_64-linux-gnux32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../../../gprofng/libcollector -
U_ASM -I.. -I
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
no, everything on x86_64-linux-gnu so far, the i686 and aarch64 builds are
configured for these targets.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i686-inux-gnu
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
--- Comment #6 from Matthias Klose ---
sorry, this is glibc 2.33, not 2.35.
$ echo __x86_64 | x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -E -
# 0 ""
# 0 ""
# 0 ""
# 1 "/usr/include/stdc-predef.h" 1 3 4
# 0 "" 2
# 1 ""
1
$ echo __x86_64 | x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -m32
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
Status|WAITING
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29116
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i686-inux-gnu |i686-inux-gnu
|
: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: doko at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
gprofng fails to build on i686-linux-gnu, trunk 20220503:
libtool: link: x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -shared -fPIC -DPIC .libs/synctrace.o
-Wl,--version-script -W
l
1 - 100 of 441 matches
Mail list logo
