https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18450
--- Comment #5 from darlingm at gmail dot com ---
Realized, I never did comment back that using absolute paths to configure and
overwriting the binutils-gdb symlinks with the gdb symlinks didn't get around
the error.
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18450
darlingm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18450
--- Comment #2 from darlingm at gmail dot com ---
To clarify, are you saying this is a GCC bug, then? Or, do you mean something
else - like user error? (I think I'm following the proper procedure for a
gcc/binutils combined build.)
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
On a fresh Fedora 21 install:
sudo yum install git gcc gcc-c++ texinfo-tex flex bison mpfr-devel gmp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18446
--- Comment #1 from darlingm at gmail dot com ---
New error discussed at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01353.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I compiled gcc trunk (6.0.0), and installed it.
I ran git clone git://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git binutils, to place it
in
