Comment #1 on issue 46479 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils: Fuzzing build
failure
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=46479#c1
This is fixed with https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/7527
--
You received this message because:
1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue
Y
Comment #3 on issue 43790 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_as:
Null-dereference READ in htab_find_slot
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=43790#c3
Fuzzer fix in https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/pull/7402
--
You received this message because:
1. You were specifically
Comment #1 on issue 41628 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils: Fuzzing build
failure
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=41628#c1
This s a false positive. All AFL build are failing right now.
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/issues/6957
Apologies for inconvenience
--
You rec
Comment #3 on issue 40837 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_addr2line:
Dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow in error_handler_internal
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40837#c3
I'm unable to reproduce this one
--
You received this message because:
1. You were specifically CC
Comment #3 on issue 40618 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe:
Dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow in error_handler_internal
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40618#c3
AFL build fix has been deployed, this should be automatically closed shortly.
--
You received thi
Comment #2 on issue 40632 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_readelf:
Dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow in unw_decode_r3
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40632#c2
This is a false positive for similar reasons as
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40620
Apo
Comment #2 on issue 40618 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe:
Dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow in error_handler_internal
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40618#c2
This is a false positive for similar reasons as
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail
Comment #3 on issue 40620 by da...@adalogics.com:
binutils:fuzz_disas_ext-bfd_arch_i386: Dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow in
fetch_data
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40620#c3
I debugged this more and it is a false positive due to the AFL build getting
messed up.
A fix wa
Comment #1 on issue 40620 by da...@adalogics.com:
binutils:fuzz_disas_ext-bfd_arch_i386: Dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow in
fetch_data
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40620#c1
Am not entirely sure what's going on here. I am unable to reproduce the issue
with libFuzzer or ho
Comment #7 on issue 40330 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_as:
Stack-use-after-return in as_bad_internal
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40330#c7
Thanks for the info!
The reason by and large is that OSS-Fuzz does not support fork-based fuzzing.
It would be ideal if
Comment #2 on issue 40330 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_as:
Stack-use-after-return in as_bad_internal
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40330#c2
Thanks for the analysis. I see two approaches forward, either come up with some
solution in the fuzzer that resets all of
Comment #4 on issue 40330 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_as:
Stack-use-after-return in as_bad_internal
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40330#c4
You're right.
However, it would be great being able to fuzz the main logic in libbfd that gas
uses so I will try to see h
Comment #2 on issue 40248 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_objdump:
Heap-buffer-overflow in bfd_mach_o_arm_canonicalize_one_reloc
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40248#c2
I think a fix was made here
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/e02812494254b70fec6fa43
Comment #3 on issue 40233 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_nm:
Heap-buffer-overflow in aout_get_external_symbols
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40233#c3
https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/commit/3f9661f12a42583c91655bc5c5b60542bcaed4e2
--
You received this messa
Comment #2 on issue 40280 by da...@adalogics.com: binutils:fuzz_objdump:
Null-dereference READ in bfd_nonfatal_message
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=40280#c2
This was an issue in the fuzzer itself, fix proposed and merge here:
https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/commit/f2
The following issue was updated:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=21180#c3
--
You received this message because:
1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings
Reply to this email to ad
16 matches
Mail list logo
