[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-06-06 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 --- Comment #10 from clegg89 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #9) > Hi Casey, > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 > > > Someone on the GNU ARM Embedded Toolchain proje

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-31 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 --- Comment #8 from clegg89 at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > Hi Casey, > > Thanks very much for reporting this bug and providing a patch. > > I am not sure why clang was complainin

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-29 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 clegg89 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #10072|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-29 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 --- Comment #4 from clegg89 at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 10072 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10072&action=edit Patch to fix R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 relocation -- You are receiving this mail becau

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-29 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 --- Comment #3 from clegg89 at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 10071 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10071&action=edit Test Case The object file test.o contains two relocations, both

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-28 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 --- Comment #2 from clegg89 at gmail dot com --- I have rebuilt binutils and verified that linking my project with the change described fixes my issue. Here is the patch: diff --git a/bfd/elf32-arm.c b/bfd/elf32-arm.c index 1725c22..b1297d9

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-28 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 --- Comment #1 from clegg89 at gmail dot com --- Reported in launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-arm-embedded/+bug/1693831 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/21523] Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-25 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21523 clegg89 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||clegg89 at gmail dot com

[Bug ld/21523] New: Relocation for R_ARM_THM_ALU_PREL_11_0 is not calculated correctly

2017-05-25 Thread clegg89 at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: clegg89 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I am using the gcc-arm-none-eabi version 6-2017-q1-update, which uses LD version 2.26. I am attempting to link in some vendor