https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31460
--- Comment #8 from James Carlson ---
(In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #7)
> Created attachment 15433 [details]
> proposed patch
That patch works perfectly. Thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31460
--- Comment #6 from James Carlson ---
Neat. I'd be more than happy to try out a patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31460
--- Comment #3 from James Carlson ---
I found a clue: the application uses libtcmalloc. It seems like this recursion
problem happens when that library is either ldopen'd into the address space or
LD_PRELOADed in.
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31460
--- Comment #2 from James Carlson ---
First of all, your test case:
% gcc -pthread t.c
t.c:3:11: warning: built-in function 'calloc' declared as non-function
[-Wbuiltin-declaration-mismatch]
3 | long long calloc = 0;
| ^~~
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31459
--- Comment #2 from James Carlson ---
Excellent! I'll use that instead. In that case, please consider adding this
option to the documentation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: carlsonj at workingcode dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15391
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15
Component: gprofng
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
Reporter: carlsonj at workingcode dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In the old Oracle Performance Analyzer system, I could use "-O" to redirect the
'collect' output to a file. In the new "
