[Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-03-31 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 --- Comment #5 from Britton Kerin --- I asked Cary to take a look at this bug, and he said: > It's ok for now, but it'll take a bit more to really support incremental > linking. I'll try to work on it sometime. -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-03-31 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 --- Comment #4 from Britton Kerin --- It makes the warnings go away. Caveats: * My use case at the moment isn't that much more extensive than the test case I provided. * I haven't tested if this fixes things for addr2line (if it's meant to)

[Bug binutils/19872] nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-03-29 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19872 --- Comment #2 from Britton Kerin --- $ cat test.c int main (void) { return 0; } $ gcc -Wall -Wextra -Werror -g -c test.c -o test.o $ rm -f test && gcc -fuse-ld=gold -Wl,--incremental test.o -o test test: stat: No such file or directory link

[Bug ld/19871] description of --pie, --pic-executable options contains wrong-looking statement

2016-03-27 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19871 Britton Kerin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug ld/19870] description of -shared option doesn't match that in gcc manual

2016-03-27 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19870 Britton Kerin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/19872] New: nm and probably addr2line can't handle binaries produced with gold --incremental

2016-03-26 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
erity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: britton.kerin at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I originally reported: > * --incremental gold produces binaries st nm --line-numbers complains like

[Bug ld/19871] New: description of --pie, --pic-executable options contains wrong-looking statement

2016-03-26 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: britton.kerin at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In the https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Options.html#Options (Section 2.1): -pie --pic-executable Create

[Bug ld/19870] New: description of -shared option doesn't match that in gcc manual

2016-03-26 Thread britton.kerin at gmail dot com
ormal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: britton.kerin at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Options.html#Options (section 2.1): -shared -Bshareable Create a shared library.