http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-14 19:50:27
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
It's definitely abinutils bug.
Rewriting and tweaking C-source will not fix a binutils bug.
The simplistic source just shows that avr-gcc actually can
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr-elf |avr
Version|2.19
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avr at gjlay dot de
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-02-16 19:57:33
UTC ---
Created attachment 5249
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5249
Disassembly
The wrong relaxation optimization. Note that fa gets called no matter what
value
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-02-16 19:54:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 5248
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5248
.s as compiled by avr-gcc
avr-gcc output according to GNU-C source
--
Configure bugmail: ht
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494
Summary: Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed
goto)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Componen
