[Bug ld/32341] ld does not keep SHF_ALLOC section indices contiguous

2024-11-05 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32341 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/32341] ld does not keep SHF_ALLOC section indices contiguous

2024-11-05 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32341 --- Comment #1 from Aaron Merey --- Created attachment 15781 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15781&action=edit sections and segments info for strip with non-contiguous SHF_ALLOC -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/32341] New: ld does not keep SHF_ALLOC section indices contiguous

2024-11-05 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: amerey at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15780 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15780&action=edit sections and segments info for strip with contiguous SH

[Bug binutils/29720] objdump -S crashes if build-id is missing

2022-10-25 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29720 --- Comment #1 from Aaron Merey --- Created attachment 14414 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14414&action=edit patch Thanks for catching this Martin. I've attached a patch that fixes this. -- You are receiving this m

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-09-13 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-09-12 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14311|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-09-12 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 --- Comment #30 from Aaron Merey --- (In reply to Martin Liska from comment #29) > Thanks for the implementation. However, I think one piece is missing and it's > find_separate_debug and find_separate_debug rely on fact the debugginfo is > pre

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-09-06 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-09-02 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 --- Comment #26 from Aaron Merey --- Created attachment 14312 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14312&action=edit 0002-Add-debuginfod-support-for-objdump-S.patch Adding a second attachment since I split up the patch into

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-09-02 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #14097|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-08-25 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 --- Comment #22 from Aaron Merey --- Created attachment 14299 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14299&action=edit Revised Patch I've attached an updated patch. I took Nick's original patch and added a function _bfd_elf_f

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-08-18 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 --- Comment #21 from Aaron Merey --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #20) > (In reply to Aaron Merey from comment #19) > > Passing > > the bfd object of the separate debuginfo instead of the bfd of the parent > > file seems to work unle

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-08-17 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 --- Comment #19 from Aaron Merey --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > > and try to keep any additional debuginfod support > > contained in objdump. > > That would be my preference too. If possible it might be best to put most of

[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod

2022-08-11 Thread amerey at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075 Aaron Merey changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nickc at redhat dot com|amerey at redhat dot com