[Bug binutils/32256] Observed local symbols while `-mno-relax' on riscv

2025-04-18 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 Akhilesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug binutils/32368] New: RISCV Generalized Reverse like grev, grevi, etc are not supported

2024-11-14 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com Target Milestone: --- Initially I reported this issue in gcc which is redirected to asm https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117604

[Bug binutils/32368] RISCV Generalized Reverse like grev, grevi, etc are not supported

2024-11-14 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32368 Akhilesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Target||risc-v -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug binutils/32256] Observed local symbols while `-mno-relax' on riscv

2024-10-30 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 --- Comment #5 from Akhilesh Kumar --- Also I observed R_RISCV_RVC_JUMP and RISCV_BRANCH RISC-V-specific relocations are completely removed but R_RISCV_PCREL and R_RISCV_CALL_PLT are present in some modules -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug binutils/32256] Observed local symbols while `-mno-relax'

2024-10-17 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 Akhilesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Bug] internal labels |Observed local symbols

[Bug binutils/32256] [Bug] internal labels present in risc-v

2024-10-17 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 --- Comment #4 from Akhilesh Kumar --- Sharing more update on this When compiling RISC-V kernel modules with the `-mno-relax` flag, I notice that local symbols with the `.L` prefix are still generated in the output, which seems inconsist

[Bug binutils/32256] [Bug] internal labels present in risc-v

2024-10-09 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 Akhilesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akhilesh.k at samsung dot com

[Bug binutils/32256] [Bug] internal labels present in risc-v

2024-10-09 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 --- Comment #2 from Akhilesh Kumar --- why these are not visible in arm objdumps but visible for riscv is there any way to suppress it with-out strip ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/32256] [Bug] internal labels present in risc-v

2024-10-09 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32256 Akhilesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akhipatel at gmail dot com -- You a

[Bug binutils/32256] New: [Bug] internal labels present in risc-v

2024-10-09 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi All `.LFB`, `.LVL`, `.LBB`, and `.LBE` are internal labels is expected in compiler generated asm file since these are internal labels i was expecting not be

[Bug ld/30938] [RISCV]linking erro with lp64f

2023-10-09 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30938 --- Comment #2 from Akhilesh Kumar --- Now i configured gcc with --enable-multilib then also unable to build for lp64f is this because ABI_FLEN is for 32 default lp64d is for 64 ? And if i want to compile the same for lp64d, lp64f and lp64

[Bug ld/30938] [RISCV]linking erro with lp64f

2023-10-04 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
||akhilesh.k at samsung dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30938] New: [RISCV]linking erro with lp64f

2023-10-04 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com Target Milestone: --- I am getting "can't link single-float modules with double-float modules" linking error, while compiling below code with lp64f. as per risc-v spec only difference is, for

[Bug ld/30877] [BUG][RISCV]relro protection not working in riscv

2023-09-25 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30877 Akhilesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akhilesh.k at samsung dot com

[Bug ld/30877] [BUG][RISCV]relro protection not working in riscv

2023-09-22 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30877 --- Comment #1 from Akhilesh Kumar --- below are the test results on RISC_V target Summary Even we compiled this application with -z,relro,-z,now on pmap showing .got address as RW Test Results :- user@starfive:~/akhilesh$ gcc -g -Wl,-

[Bug ld/30877] [BUG][RISCV]relro protection not working in riscv

2023-09-22 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30877 Akhilesh Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Target||RISC-V Severity|normal

[Bug ld/30877] New: [BUG][RISCV]relro protection not working in riscv

2023-09-21 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com Target Milestone: --- below linker issue reported in gcc https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111518 > Andreas Schwab 2023-09-21 13:21:49 UTC > That's a linker bug, pl

[Bug binutils/24848] New: [Bug] When use -flto "weak symbol" are converted to "t".

2019-07-24 Thread akhilesh.k at samsung dot com
Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: akhilesh.k at samsung dot com Target Milestone: --- when i use -flto "weak symbol" are converted to "t". I really don't know whether thi