On 09/01/2014 04:53 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
>> On 09/01/2014 08:09 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>>> So, what exactly should be done? Can we hack ld so that if filename is
>>> "libots.so", lazy
On 09/01/2014 08:09 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> So, what exactly should be done? Can we hack ld so that if filename is
> "libots.so", lazy binding for symbols in this library is turned off
> automatically?
Not hack ld.so.
Modify the libots.so binary such that _OtsZero is STT_NOTYPE. The linke
On 08/30/2014 06:46 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> The only possibility to save them is in the code at the beginning of
> _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ - do you think it would be possible to save the
> registers on the stack here? Or, would it cause unwind problems?
It wouldn't work.
> What exactly t
On 08/29/2014 12:29 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> I found out that the patch cc75d373fdb9668f367959f99f0b67e056a6c18a
> (Enable secureplt by default for alpha-linux) committed to binutils git
> breaks ld on alpha.
>
> This is a minimalized testcase that shows the breakage:
> http://people.redhat.
