On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 10:31 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > It looks like the top-level makefile in binutils doesn't grok the
> > install-strip target.
>
> Correct. If you are really miffed by this, please file a bug report at
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/.
OK thanks!
> > However if I look a
Is there another/better way to do this? I wanted to have the binutils
tools stripped when they are installed. Typically for autoconfiscated
environments I run "make install-strip" to do this.
For binutils if I try this I get:
make: *** No rule to make target `install-strip'. Stop.
It looks li
On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 16:57 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> For 2.18, it's revision 1.1.18.1 of elf.texi. I had to go into the
> Attic to find it. Cvsweb does not appear to do The Right Thing for
> files that do not exist on trunk.
Oh blerg. OK, thanks.
Still and all, it's something that wou
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 11:59 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> The release branch has the generated files in it. This is how
> binutils releases have traditionally been managed. It's the snapshots
> before the final release that cause this problem.
Hi Daniel;
I don't think this is true, at least
There are some problems with the released tarball for binutils 2.18,
which make it impossible to build unless you have a proper version of
makeinfo installed on your system. I've seen the problems reported that
a specific version of makeinfo is required, but this bug is not about
that: a correctly
