Dwarf changes

Hi, I have done porting of GNU binutils for a new architecture. Can you tell me if I have to do any changes for dwarf, while porting. Thanks, Parul ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

Re: Changes done in binutils revision

Thanks, I'll check it out. On 11-Oct-2017 5:43 PM, "Nick Clifton" wrote: > Hi Parul, > > > Can someone help me, how can I check what all changes are done from 2.26 > to 2.27. > > I do not know how to use git. > > I want to know what all changes are done for x86-64. > > I am not a git expert eith

Changes done in binutils revision

Hi, I had done porting using binutils 2.26. Now I want to move to binutils 2.27. Can someone help me, how can I check what all changes are done from 2.26 to 2.27. I do not know how to use git. I want to know what all changes are done for x86-64. Thanks, Parul __

-mfence-as-lock-add option in binutils 2.27

Hi, I found that a new option "-mfence-as-lock-add" is added in binutils 2.27. It generate lock instruction when "-mfence-as-lock-add=yes". Otherwise, mfence, lfence, sfence is generated. Please let me know why this option is required. Why lock instruction is needed. Thanks, Parul ___

binutils options

Hi, I am porting binutils to my new architecture. I have made changes similar to one of the architecture which GNU binutils already supports. I am also able to do testing of binutils using dejaGNU. But, there are few options for which I am stuck up and not able to test these options. These are as