On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Nilmoni Deb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > This is correct and documented behaviour. All Unix linkers behave
> > > this way.
> >
> > In other words, its a feature, not a bug. It seems that the ICC
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Nilmoni Deb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Lets say I am running the following command
> >
> > gcc z.o -lX -lY -o z
> >
> > and libX.a depends on a function that is defined in libY.a then the order
>
Lets say I am running the following command
gcc z.o -lX -lY -o z
and libX.a depends on a function that is defined in libY.a then the order
of linking appears to be important. While the previous command works, the
next one (with order reversed) will fail:
gcc z.o -lY -lX -o z
Th
