On Mon, 1 Sep 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 09/01/2014 08:09 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > So, what exactly should be done? Can we hack ld so that if filename is
> > "libots.so", lazy binding for symbols in this library is turned off
> > automatically?
&
On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/30/2014 06:46 AM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > The only possibility to save them is in the code at the beginning of
> > _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ - do you think it would be possible to save the
> > registers on the sta
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 12:29 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > I found out that the patch cc75d373fdb9668f367959f99f0b67e056a6c18a
> > (Enable secureplt by default for alpha-linux) committed to binutils git
> > breaks ld on alph
Hi
I found out that the patch cc75d373fdb9668f367959f99f0b67e056a6c18a
(Enable secureplt by default for alpha-linux) committed to binutils git
breaks ld on alpha.
This is a minimalized testcase that shows the breakage:
http://people.redhat.com/~mpatocka/testcases/alpha-ld-bug/ld-bug.tar.xz
To
Hi
This patch fixes crash that happens if we build too big linux kernel so
that offsets overflow. There are several bugs in elf64-hppa.c:
1. offset is 64-bit, but 32-bit format "%lx" is used. This causes
parameters mismatch
2. eh may be NULL. If it is NULL, I changed the code to print "unknown"
Hi Mikulas,
I see but gas should at least write error and not generate incorrect code.
In which case please could you create a bugzilla entry for this so that we
can track this problem properly.
I did.
Mikulas
Cheers
Nick
___
bug-binutils
Hi
Hi Mikulas,
__asm__ (".global number; number = 0x12345678");
extern void number;
These two declarations are not compatible. The latter declares number as
a data symbol, but the former defines it is an absolute symbol.
I thought that .types do not care for linking,
Andreas is not ta
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Mikulas Patocka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
__asm__ (".global number; number = 0x12345678");
extern void number;
These two declarations are not compatible. The latter declares number as
a data symbol, but the former defines i
Hi
I found the following issue. This program:
#include
__asm__ (".global number; number = 0x12345678");
extern void number;
int main()
{
printf("%p\n", &number);
return 0;
}
works when compiled without -fPIC and segfaults when compiled with -fPIC.
When the program is broken to
