could you file a bug please here:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
make sure to include a small test case that can be assembled
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.
On 12 Apr 2016 13:55, Pervin, William wrote:
> While not a bug report, I have been told to write this site for information
> and help. Sorry if it's inappropriate.
you want binut...@sourceware.org for general discussion
https://sourceware.org/binutils/
> The new Raspberry Pi 3 has a 64-b
patches should be sent to binut...@sourceware.org and not the bug list.
this list is more for watching bugzilla reports.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
On 07 Aug 2015 17:03, Kristopher Windsor wrote:
> Hope I have the right mailing list.
sorry, but this list is unrelated to yum or php or centos.
you probably should post to some centos forums/lists instead.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__
this mailing list is really only for bugzilla use. you should use
binut...@sourceware.org for questions instead.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists
bug-binutils@ is for bugzilla e-mail only. please use binutils@ for
questions.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binu
On Friday 22 March 2013 01:25:44 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 22 March 2013 00:12:38 Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > "Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]" writes:
> > > There used to be something like a snapshot sequence number (52, 90)
> > > like in these:
r.bz222594 KB3/18/2013 5:43:00 AM
> > binutils-.tar.bz2 22594 KB3/18/2013 5:43:00 AM
>
> This may have been broken since this change:
>
> 2012-07-27 Mike Frysinger
>
> * configure.in (AC_INIT): Call with the args bfd and 2.22.5
