https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31130
--- Comment #4 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
ok thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31130
--- Comment #2 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
actually, i don't mean that XNEWVEC return a stack address, i mean "depth" is
stack address and it has been store into new_storage
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31131
--- Comment #3 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
thanks for your reply. 2.32 is old but i've check this bug still existing in
current version. and there are several system still use 2.32 as there default
version.for exam
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31131
--- Comment #2 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> Already fixed. 2.32 is old. You should look at current source if you want
> to help improve binutils. git clone
> https:/
: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15250
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15250&action=edit
picture showing the potential bug
hi, i found a potential memo
: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
hello, i found there is a return of stack address in function C_alloca located
in libiberty/alloca.c
step1: initialize "depth" with address of "probe&quo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30951
yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC| |1157401
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29262
--- Comment #3 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> Fixed.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 14151
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14151&action=edit
diagram of memory leak bug
Hi, I found a potential memory leak bug in the
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 14150
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14150&action=edit
diagram of memory leak bug
Hi, I found a potential memory leak bug in the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29256
--- Comment #2 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to cvs-com...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #1)
> The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
>
> https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binuti
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29254
--- Comment #3 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> Fixed for 2.39
thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29255
--- Comment #3 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #2)
> Fixed for 2.39
thank you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 14148
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14148&action=edit
diagram of memory leak bug
Hi, I found a potential memory leak bug in the
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 14146
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14146&action=edit
diagram of memory leak bug
Hi, I found a potential memory leak bug in the
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi, I found a potential memory leak bug in the project source code of binutils,
and I have shown the execution sequence of the program that may have generated
the bug on a
diagram
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28210
--- Comment #2 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> This one does appear to still exist in current sources. Please report
> libiberty bugs to the gcc project at https://gcc.gnu.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28209
--- Comment #2 from yuxuan He <1157401338 at qq dot com> ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> This was fixed a long time ago. Please do not report bugs against a version
> of binutils that was released in 2013 without fi
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13602
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13602&action=edit
NULL Pointer Dereference in file make-relative-p
: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13601
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13601&action=edit
return stack address in function d_print_comp,file cp-dem
: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: 1157401338 at qq dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 13600
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13600&action=edit
return stack address in function C_alloca,file alloca.c
21 matches
Mail list logo
