[Bug libsframe/33166] extra cfi directive causes crash

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33166 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #3 from

[Bug libsframe/33166] extra cfi directive causes crash

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33166 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Bug 33126 depends on bug 33131, which changed state. Bug 33131 Summary: Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.) https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

2025-07-16 Thread indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 --- Comment #8 from Indu Bhagat --- Fix committed to 2_45 branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9d3376031aef4ea56750b0b59c3a1e0c4e8e0403 commit 9d3376031aef4ea56750b0b59

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 --- Comment #11 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fcf7470408aa0508fbe99abb99547757a348383d commit fcf7470408aa0508fbe99abb99547757a348383

[Bug libsframe/33166] extra cfi directive causes crash

2025-07-16 Thread saugustine at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33166 --- Comment #1 from Sterling Augustine --- If a cfi directive doesn't have an instruction following, then objdump crashes. I believe this is valid assembly--at least it doesn't seem to bother the other unwinding formats. I would favor making

[Bug libsframe/33166] New: extra cfi directive causes crash

2025-07-16 Thread saugustine at google dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33166 Bug ID: 33166 Summary: extra cfi directive causes crash Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: li

[Bug binutils/33145] CR16 binary output format breaks relocations

2025-07-16 Thread Jomosoto at proton dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33145 Jomosoto changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #11 from Nick Alcock --- > OK, so it's kind of acceptable to have required configurations for a GCC used > for binutils testing, then. I wasn't sure. Time to build a new GCC locally on > that

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #11 from Nick Alcock --- OK, so it's kind of acceptable to have required configurations for a GCC used for binutils testing, then. I wasn't sure. Time to build a new GCC locally on that cfarm box :) (it *is* probably valuable to h

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #8 from Nick Alcock --- > Yes -- but if GCC wasn't built with GNU ld, collect2 appears to run the > non-GNU > ld anyway, ignoring(?) -B: Such a gcc is almost guaranteed to fail when used wi

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #9 from Nick Alcock --- OK, so this GCC was configured with --without-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/bin/ld --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/gnu/bin/as These absolute paths force collect2 to use those paths no matter what -B says. nix@s11-sp

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #8 from Nick Alcock --- Yes -- but if GCC wasn't built with GNU ld, collect2 appears to run the non-GNU ld anyway, ignoring(?) -B: nix@s11-sparc:~/binutils-gdb/build/libctf$ LIBCTF_DEBUG=t gcc -v -B/home/nix/binutils-gdb/build/lib

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #6 from Nick Alcock --- > ... OK, so I need to detect (and probably need to detect for ld tests as well) > when gcc is built to use a non-GNU ld, and skip all tests that require CTF > dedup in

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #6 from Nick Alcock --- ... OK, so I need to detect (and probably need to detect for ld tests as well) when gcc is built to use a non-GNU ld, and skip all tests that require CTF dedup in this case. (Again, this probably includes a

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #5 from Nick Alcock --- OK, the libctf failures are because it's running the wrong linker. Now, what's up with that... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #4 from Nick Alcock --- We can probably assume that pre-v8plus hardware is long extinct, so this horrible hack will probably do. (A shame we can't arrange to assemble "the same way GCC does", though.) -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #2 from Nick Alcock --- > There's a big pile of libctf/ failures too, none of which I remember seeing > before... I'll have a look at those. The only remaining one I see is on 32-bit Solaris/

[Bug gprofng/33151] Weak functions are not displayed

2025-07-16 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33151 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Thanks for the suggested fix. It looks good to me. Could you prepare the path and send it to binut...@sourceware.org for review? Hopefully we can include your fix in 2.45. -- You are receiving this

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 --- Comment #2 from Nick Alcock --- There's a big pile of libctf/ failures too, none of which I remember seeing before... I'll have a look at those. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libctf/33162] Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Bug 33126 depends on bug 33131, which changed state. Bug 33131 Summary: Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.) https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Bug 33126 depends on bug 33131, which changed state. Bug 33131 Summary: Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.) https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||33131 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewa

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Bug 33126 depends on bug 33127, which changed state. Bug 33127 Summary: "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section. https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 What|Removed

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #11 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d534793d98c1543c9203316a00eeccc653af090e commit d534793d98c1543c9203316a00

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 Blocks|

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Bug 33126 depends on bug 33156, which changed state. Bug 33156 Summary: 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 What|Removed |A

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Blockers are gone. I need to figure out how to handle the warnings. Plan is to have this ready for 2.46 (long before then), not 2.45. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the b

[Bug ld/33146] sframe: .gnu_object_only contains concatenated SFrame sections

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #9 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6c0b1a20b61396eb2ae1c19fcb8ac29d70b53440 commit 6c0b1a20b61396eb2ae1c19fcb8

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #10 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=952749899538dddee746a774505d8791ae91c259 commit 952749899538dddee746a77450

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.45 Status|NEW

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Bug 33126 depends on bug 33146, which changed state. Bug 33146 Summary: sframe: .gnu_object_only contains concatenated SFrame sections https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146 What|Removed |Adde

[Bug ld/33146] sframe: .gnu_object_only contains concatenated SFrame sections

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146 --- Comment #14 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=64304170aaaca14b457a47d7e494dfb1f30f379a commit 64304170aaaca14b457a47d7e494

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 --- Comment #9 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=39363ad0a0be0f93a5acc3fcf1bd846926758f61 commit 39363ad0a0be0f93a5acc3fcf1bd8

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 --- Comment #24 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b4782f2504f77d7aa4ce3e4007c13970963b5692 commit b4782f2504f77d7aa4ce3e4007c1

[Bug ld/33146] sframe: .gnu_object_only contains concatenated SFrame sections

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146 --- Comment #12 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=91b0c7e3110c6019e5ef52b27b9ac709aaa1ff51 commit 91b0c7e3110c6019e5ef52b27b9a

[Bug ld/33146] sframe: .gnu_object_only contains concatenated SFrame sections

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146 --- Comment #13 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=78a230e080e960c96a46a5adbc97f3c83dadf67d commit 78a230e080e960c96a46a5adbc97

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #10 from Nick Alcock --- Well, with that fixed the libctf tests do pass on Sol11.4. The ld tests are... full of pain, but still better than on some platforms. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the

[Bug libctf/33161] libctf: configuring and building fails with the Solaris linker

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33161 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libctf/33162] New: Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33162 Bug ID: 33162 Summary: Diagnostics FAILs on Solaris Product: binutils Version: 2.45 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libctf Assi

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #8 from Nick Alcock --- > That's not the only problem I found on Sol11.4... builds fail entirely when > Solaris ld is in use because the libctf-nobfd.ver script generation is broken. > I'll ra

[Bug libctf/33161] New: libctf: configuring and building fails with the Solaris linker

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33161 Bug ID: 33161 Summary: libctf: configuring and building fails with the Solaris linker Product: binutils Version: 2.43 Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug libctf/33161] libctf: configuring and building fails with the Solaris linker

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33161 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Host||*-solaris2.11* Build|

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #8 from Nick Alcock --- That's not the only problem I found on Sol11.4... builds fail entirely when Solaris ld is in use because the libctf-nobfd.ver script generation is broken. I'll raise another bug. -- You are receiving this

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #5 from Nick Alcock --- > Oh of course, we already have mmap-disabling code in place! More fool me, I > only wrote it. It will also turn off (entirely working) mmapping of reads, but > since t

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 Nick Alcock changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nick.alcock at oracle dot com

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #5 from Nick Alcock --- Oh of course, we already have mmap-disabling code in place! More fool me, I only wrote it. It will also turn off (entirely working) mmapping of reads, but since that's only used for uncompressed CTF, and nev

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #3 from Nick Alcock --- Thanks for the update. > Mixed mmap() and read() from the same fd is absolutely nonportable (or at the > very least delicate and breaks frequently, as seen here) and w

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread nick.alcock at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #3 from Nick Alcock --- Thank you for the report! The advantage of the mmap dance is purely that it makes writing out the header simpler: we can jump around in it and just treat it like a data structure rather than messing about w

[Bug ld/33153] [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" > --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth --- [...] >>> However, there are quite a number of regressions in the binutils >>> testsuite: >> >> I suspect/hope that these are due t

[Bug libctf/29292] Several CTF tests FAIL on Solaris

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29292 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- > --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- > I'll try to create a minimal testcase (just tmpfile, mmap, fill buffer, msync, > munmap, fread) to see if the problem reproduces there. Here's what I've got: #inclu

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=50c1c57426db6e1c7b44b4d05f0b07fcba91f890 commit 50c1c57426db6e1c7b44b4d05f0b07fcba91f890