[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > Created attachment 16179 [details] > A patch > > Try this. This works! Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #16169|1 |0 is obsolete|

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- $ readelf -r eh-group.o [...] Relocation section '.rela.sframe' at offset 0x310 contains 2 entries: Offset Info Type Sym. ValueSym. Name + Addend 001c 00040002

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1535d2a0ce4e474f1a42e8b8720de01b7dc1f656 commit 1535d2a0ce4e474f1a42e8b8720de01b7dc1f656 Au

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- I don't understand why sframe-reloc-2b.s passes yet but this fails. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Created attachment 16178 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16178&action=edit pr33156.tar.xz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- $ cat /tmp/test.sh BINUTILS=/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb cd /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../gas/as-new -I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -o tmpdir/eh-group1size.o /

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 --- Comment #23 from Sam James --- The assertion is gone. I hit PR33156 though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gas/33156] 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||33126 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewa

[Bug gas/33126] SFrame: add a --enable-sframe (or similar) configure option to default-enable --gsframe in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||33156 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewa

[Bug gas/33156] New: 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33156 Bug ID: 33156 Summary: 'Link eh-group.o to eh-group' test fails with default-SFrames gas Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- Fixed for 2.46 but no milestone for that yet. Remains to be seen if we will ask for backporting some extra fixes to 2.45 or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |indu.bhagat at oracle dot com -

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8aad677a12832885acd5be1de8f41e740b8e713d commit 8aad677a12832885acd5be1de8f41e740b8e713d

[Bug gas/33125] SFrame: provide a way to negate --gsframe in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33125 --- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e6b2368b9556ea6298a1f0de97baeabf1b5b18fd commit e6b2368b9556ea6298a1f0de97baeabf1b5b18fd

[Bug ld/33131] Failed assertion when linking gccgo (sframe_decoder_get_fre: Assertion `fre->fre_start_addr < fdep->sfde_func_size' failed.)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131 --- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Indu Bhagat : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=387efef5fef727cbe52099dcd5012905c4205be3 commit 387efef5fef727cbe52099dcd5012905c4205be

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 --- Comment #21 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5f9bf0cf711a153a0a20d6ff88181e9a6775bdba commit 5f9bf0cf711a153a0a20d6ff88181e9a6775bdba A

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed on master branch so far. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 --- Comment #20 from Indu Bhagat --- (Apologies for the delay.) I was trying to reason for SFrame if the generated R_*_NONE entries will always be towards the end. To which the answer is : yes. SFrame merging code does rely on one-to-one or

[Bug gas/33128] GAS emits compressed instruction with .option arch, -c

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33128 Jesse Taube changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org --

[Bug ld/33153] [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/33154] addr2line ignores subroutines with DW_AT_ranges of form DW_FORM_rnglistx

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33154 Avi Kivity changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avi at scylladb dot com -- You are rece

[Bug binutils/33154] New: addr2line ignores subroutines with DW_AT_ranges of form DW_FORM_rnglistx

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33154 Bug ID: 33154 Summary: addr2line ignores subroutines with DW_AT_ranges of form DW_FORM_rnglistx Product: binutils Version: 2.46 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug ld/33153] New: [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Bug ID: 33153 Summary: [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris Product: binutils Version: 2.45 Status: NEW Severity: norma

[Bug ld/33153] [2.45 regression] Linking fails with unknown attributes version on Solaris

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33153 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.45 -- You are receiving this mail be

[Bug gprofng/33151] New: Weak functions are not displayed

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33151 Bug ID: 33151 Summary: Weak functions are not displayed Product: binutils Version: 2.45 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng

[Bug gas/33030] [Z80] [PATCH] accept leading zeros on dollar local labels when using -sdcc

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33030 --- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_45-branch branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=72300c917ff7f0ec77b141066a2700988834087d commit 72300c917ff7f0ec77b141066

[Bug gas/33030] [Z80] [PATCH] accept leading zeros on dollar local labels when using -sdcc

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33030 --- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Beulich : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=804ccd0a649249bb97d1ac7e09af08ffbf743e44 commit 804ccd0a649249bb97d1ac7e09af08ffbf743e4

[Bug libsframe/33127] "ld -r" doesn't remove the sframe relocation against the discarded section.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #16171|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libsframe/33140] SFrame test failures on x86-64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33140 --- Comment #6 from Jens Remus --- Hello Indu, thank you very much for taking care! I had missed to run the libsframe tests ... :-/ Regards, Jens -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.