https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #17)
> Indeed, my proposed patch is not addressing the issue, tests fail. Your
> patch does work.
Should I submit my patch?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #17 from Indu Bhagat ---
Indeed, my proposed patch is not addressing the issue, tests fail. Your patch
does work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #10 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=939eb467b21de5d18ee703755fb9704a525cfe21
commit 939eb467b21de5d18ee703755fb9704a525cfe21
A
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Indu Bhagat from comment #7)
> The patch works. Thanks a lot for your help.
A patch is posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-July/142577.html
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a57a3a169ea9ec79977949c9c8dccd3a2a615fae
commit a57a3a169ea9ec79977949c9c8dccd3a2a615fae
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #7 from Indu Bhagat ---
The patch works. Thanks a lot for your help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16172|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ef7a634dc01df3d78f208c93316b52937d3fe8f4
commit ef7a634dc01df3d78f208c93316b52937d3fe8f4
Au
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 16172
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16172&action=edit
A patch to move gas_sframe_check to binutils-common.exp
Together with this:
diff --git a/ld/testsuite/ld-plugi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16169|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33131
--- Comment #3 from Indu Bhagat ---
With the proposed patch, GCC's go frontend builds fine.
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2025-July/142560.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
Indu Bhagat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
Indu Bhagat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33126
Referenced Bugs:
https://source
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33126
Indu Bhagat changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||33146
Referenced Bugs:
https://source
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
--- Comment #14 from Indu Bhagat ---
Created attachment 16170
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16170&action=edit
Fix using SEC_EXCLUDE
How about this patch to fix the issue by setting SEC_EXCLUDE?
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33127
Indu Bhagat changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||indu.bhagat at oracle dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat ---
So far, I see linker concatenating the two .sframe sections for
.gnu_object_only section output. Also can be seen in the temporary file (see
the two 0xdee2 which is the SFRAME_MAGIC in the SFrame header).
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
--- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat ---
TL;DR: Some issue in the .gnu_object_only section which, IIUC, are generated
when there is (mixed) LTO and none-LTO usage with ld -r. Currently the .sframe
section in the .gnu_object_only contents show one
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33146
Bug ID: 33146
Summary: sframe: .gnu_object_only contains concatenated SFrame
sections
Product: binutils
Version: 2.45
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33145
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
The binary target only knows about simple 8,16,32 bit relocations, if there are
any other, non-trivial relocations then producing binary output with the linker
is going to fail. It is always better to us
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33095
--- Comment #2 from genericnerdyusername ---
You could argue that you also explicitly disabled compressed instruction
generation with `-march`. I also don't understand why this exists for the C
extension but not for others. Regardless, this is
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33145
Bug ID: 33145
Summary: CR16 binary output format breaks relocations
Product: binutils
Version: 2.46 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33144
Bug ID: 33144
Summary: CR16 loadx/storx abs20 disassembly wrong address if >=
0xFF
Product: binutils
Version: 2.46 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: m
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143
Jomosoto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|gas
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33143
Bug ID: 33143
Summary: CR16 storx abs always choses slow instruction variant
for high addresses
Product: binutils
Version: 2.46 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33142
Bug ID: 33142
Summary: CR16 loadx disp14 format broken
Product: binutils
Version: 2.46 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
29 matches
Mail list logo
