[Bug binutils/3298] -mrelax broken for sh-elf

2025-05-22 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3298 --- Comment #9 from Joern Rennecke --- (In reply to Quentin Boswank from comment #7) > (In reply to Joern Rennecke from comment #3) > > One thing that I just noticed while browsing through > > sh_elf_relax_delete_bytes > > is that we don't proc

[Bug binutils/3298] -mrelax broken for sh-elf

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3298 --- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6cd9586f7f502d9034751df1b88b1ae91a34a8b6 commit 6cd9586f7f502d9034751df1b88b1ae91a34a8b6

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- Thanks. I'll check. If you hear nothing, it is all fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #10 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_38-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9bee8d65d32ac1480997c13ce76ae7991180f1ed commit 9bee8d65d32ac1480997c13ce76a

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #9 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_39-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=37c08b29c8a656a14a58003629f438f0f52d8a2c commit 37c08b29c8a656a14a58003629f43

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_40-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=893d5e8c935fb83e085cd0003e2578442c764a09 commit 893d5e8c935fb83e085cd0003e257

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_41-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a4206092924aee25c62b8e4013960b1b158155a0 commit a4206092924aee25c62b8e4013960

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_42-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f9488b0d92b591bdf3ff8cce485cb0e1b3727cc0 commit f9488b0d92b591bdf3ff8cce485cb

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=430bb75294ec6ae84355337e63d299527a00a34f commit 430bb75294ec6ae84355337e63d29

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > We had a report of this as well but I wasn't sure if it was a bug. These > jumps happen with new relocation types at least. Please open a new bug report if it isn't the

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=452f5511154ca02095a271cf085e17f536587207 commit 452f5511154ca02095a271cf085e1

Re: Issue 419436721: binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in offset_in_range

2025-05-22 Thread buganizer-system
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/419436721 Changed Disclosure: → Aug 20, 2025 ___ Reference Info: 419436721 binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in offset_in_ra

[Bug gprofng/32943] libgprofng.so: undefined reference to `std::ios_base_library_init()'

2025-05-22 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32943 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprofng/32943] libgprofng.so: undefined reference to `std::ios_base_library_init()'

2025-05-22 Thread zohran.londais at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32943 --- Comment #5 from Zohran Londais --- Sorry, I forgot to come back to this open bug. The bug came from a wrong behavior of my package manager after a recent update, thank you for your help guys, sorry for this. -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug ld/32991] "pushl main@GOT(%ebx)" is mishandled by older binutils

2025-05-22 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32991 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #2 from

Issue 419436721: binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in offset_in_range

2025-05-22 Thread buganizer-system
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/419436721 Reference Info: 419436721 binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in offset_in_range component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz status: New repor

[Bug gprofng/32892] source line level information not available with "-g -O2"

2025-05-22 Thread bruno at clisp dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892 Bruno Haible changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED