[Bug gprofng/32985] [2.45 Regression] jsynprog test fails on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32985 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Could you please attach 3 files from your test-area: gprofng/tmpdir/{jsynprof,mttest,synprog}/diff.out Is your test-area on local filesystem or on nfs ? -- You are receiving this mail because: Y

[Bug gas/32952] sframe: incorrect handling of .cfi_undefined in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32952 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |indu.bhagat at oracle dot com -

[Bug ld/32666] Incorrect .rela.sframe when using ld -r

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32666 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug gas/32952] sframe: incorrect handling of .cfi_undefined in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32952 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug gas/32953] sframe: incorrect handling of .cfi_same_value in gas

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32953 --- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat --- V2 discussion on mailing list: https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/20250515210619.3808179-5-indu.bha...@oracle.com/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/32985] [2.45 Regression] jsynprog test fails on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32985 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose --- looking at the complete build log at https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=binutils&arch=x32&ver=2.44.50.20250520-1&stamp=1747753680&raw=1 it looks like the jni.h is found, and the examples are

[Bug gprofng/32985] [2.45 Regression] jsynprog test fails on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32985 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- It looks like Java profiling was disabled in your build. configure did not find include/jni.h in YOUR_JDK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Re: Issue 418396704: binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in s_fill

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/418396704 Changed access level: Limited visibility → Default access pe...@google.com added comment #3: This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the

Re: Issue 418826548: binutils:fuzz_addr2line: Undefined-shift in loongarch_elf_add_sub_reloc_uleb128

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/418826548 Changed access level: Limited visibility → Default access Disclosure: → Aug 18, 2025 pe...@google.com added comment #3: This bug has been fixe

[Bug binutils/32986] New: installed libtool archives contain references to build-time paths

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32986 Bug ID: 32986 Summary: installed libtool archives contain references to build-time paths Product: binutils Version: 2.42 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ld/32983] [2.45 Regression] test Run pr19719 fun defined fails on s390x-linux-gnu, sh4-linux-gnu, riscv64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32983 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[2.45 Regression] test Run |[2.45 Regression] test Run

[Bug gprofng/32985] New: [2.45 Regression] jsynprog test fails on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32985 Bug ID: 32985 Summary: [2.45 Regression] jsynprog test fails on x86_64-linux-gnux32 Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug gprofng/32985] [2.45 Regression] jsynprog test fails on x86_64-linux-gnux32

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32985 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at sourceware dot org

[Bug ld/32984] [2.45 Regression] bootstrap tests failing on loongarch64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32984 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||loongarch64-linux-gnu -- You are re

[Bug ld/32984] New: [2.45 Regression] bootstrap tests failing on loongarch64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32984 Bug ID: 32984 Summary: [2.45 Regression] bootstrap tests failing on loongarch64-linux-gnu Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal

[Bug ld/32983] [2.45 Regression] test Run pr19719 fun defined fails on s390x-linux-gnu, sh4-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32983 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||s390x-linux-gnu |

[Bug ld/32983] New: [2.45 Regression] test Run pr19719 fun defined fails on s390x-linux-gnu, sh4-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32983 Bug ID: 32983 Summary: [2.45 Regression] test Run pr19719 fun defined fails on s390x-linux-gnu, sh4-linux-gnu Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: NEW

[Bug libctf/32903] Error pointer overwritten on successful dict open in ctf_dict_open

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32903 --- Comment #5 from Nick Alcock --- OK, so having added some actual tests for this, more than ctf_bufopen needs fixing: a bunch of ctf_archive entry points do too. Fix under test (not just on v4: against master too). We still do not set the c

Re: Issue 418396704: binutils:fuzz_as: Integer-overflow in s_fill

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/418396704 Changed status: New → Verified assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com 87...@developer.gs

Re: Issue 418826548: binutils:fuzz_addr2line: Undefined-shift in loongarch_elf_add_sub_reloc_uleb128

Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the team that works on this product. https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/418826548 Changed status: New → Verified assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com 87...@developer.gs