https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18028
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32546
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32546
--- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6ebd38072de4a77a2d28f04a79b64ab570532e98
commit 6ebd38072de4a77a2d28f04a79b64ab570532e98
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #5)
> > > When compiler sees a hidden undefined symbol, it assumes that
> > > it is defined somewhere else and it isn't an ABS symbo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
I noticed earlier:
```
Executing on host: sh -c {x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
-B/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-/work/build/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/binutils-/work/binutils/ld/testsu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #18)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > > > Created attachment 16086 [de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #5)
> > When compiler sees a hidden undefined symbol, it assumes that
> > it is defined somewhere else and it isn't an ABS symbol. As
> > the result, you won't get 0x2a.
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #18 from Zhiyuan Lv ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16)
> (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #15)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > > Created attachment 16086 [details]
> > > A new patch
> > >
> > > Please us
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--- Comm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16086|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #15)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> > Created attachment 16086 [details]
> > A new patch
> >
> > Please use this one.
>
> I tested the latest patch here togeth
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/416633165
Changed
access level: Limited visibility → Default access
pe...@google.com added comment #3:
This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #15 from Zhiyuan Lv ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> Created attachment 16086 [details]
> A new patch
>
> Please use this one.
I tested the latest patch here together with your gcc patch, now both test.c
and kernel bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #5 from Stephen Kell ---
> When compiler sees a hidden undefined symbol, it assumes that
> it is defined somewhere else and it isn't an ABS symbol. As
> the result, you won't get 0x2a.
I see. In what way does the "not an ABS symb
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #0)
> > > $ grep . exe.c lib.c lib.lds
> > > exe.c:extern void lib_func(void);
> > >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32443
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Kell ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Stephen Kell from comment #0)
> > $ grep . exe.c lib.c lib.lds
> > exe.c:extern void lib_func(void);
> > exe.c:int main(void)
> > exe.c:{
> > exe.c: lib
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16084|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #12)
> Hi H.J.,
>
> On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:15:14AM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
> >
> > --- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #12 from Zhiyuan Lv ---
Hi H.J.,
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:15:14AM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
>
> --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv f
Hi H.J.,
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 07:15:14AM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
>
> --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
> (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #7)
> > And, the GCC version I used is 14.2.0, which will generate per function
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #9)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #7)
> > > And, the GCC version I used is 14.2.0, which will generate per function
> > >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #16083|0 |1
is obsolete|
Replying to this email means your email address will be shared with the
team that works on this product.
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/416633165
Changed
status: New → Verified
assignee: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
verifier: → cl...@appspot.gserviceaccount.com
87...@developer.gs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #6 from Zhiyuan Lv ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> Created attachment 16083 [details]
> A patch to add --unique-pushsection and .pushuniquesection
>
> Try this.
Hi H.J, the patch works nicely with my simple test case,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #9 from Zhiyuan Lv ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #7)
> > And, the GCC version I used is 14.2.0, which will generate per function
> > section of "__patchable_function_entries". Than
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Zhiyuan Lv from comment #7)
> And, the GCC version I used is 14.2.0, which will generate per function
> section of "__patchable_function_entries". Thanks!
Now, the question is if GCC should generat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32961
--- Comment #7 from Zhiyuan Lv ---
And, the GCC version I used is 14.2.0, which will generate per function section
of "__patchable_function_entries". Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
28 matches
Mail list logo
