https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892
--- Comment #5 from Bruno Haible ---
Created attachment 16076
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16076&action=edit
gperf and test.1.er from Bruno's machine
I got the same negative results with various GCC versions:
g++ (
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892
--- Comment #6 from Bruno Haible ---
The binutils binaries that I built today identify themselves as
$ gp-collect-app --version
GNU gprofng-collect-app binutils version 2.44.50
Copyright (C) 2025 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17112
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892
--- Comment #4 from Vladimir Mezentsev
---
I cannot reproduce the problem:
% history
1004 tar xf gperf-3.3.tar.gz
1005 cd gperf-3.3/
1006 export CC=gcc; export CXX=g++; unset CFLAGS; unset CXXFLAGS; export
CPPFLAGS=-Wall
1007 g++ --
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32903
Nick Alcock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nick.alcock at oracle
dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892
Bruno Haible changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.45
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32892
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNE