https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32944
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32943
--- Comment #3 from Vladimir Mezentsev
---
It looks like c++ libraries are absent.
Try:
sudo apt-get install g++-multilib
Or maybe it runs the gcc linker instead of g++.
Try to add -lstdc++ :
libtool: link: g++ -Wall -pthread -Wno-switch
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32944
--- Comment #2 from Sharma, Arindam ---
It works there, so I will try and report this to ubuntu.
Thanks for the help.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32944
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Please try to reproduce this with binutils-2.44 or trunk. If it works there,
you'll need to report this to Ubuntu instead.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32943
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|gprofng
Assignee|unassigned at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32944
Sharma, Arindam changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arindam.sharma at imperial dot
ac.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32944
Bug ID: 32944
Summary: objdump (2.34) segfaults with option list "-x -d -r -t
-p -S
--dwarf=info,rawline,decodedline,frames,frames-interp,
follow-links,Ranges,gd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32943
--- Comment #1 from Zohran Londais ---
The thing strange is if I disable gprofng, binutils build.
So what need gprofng to compile properly ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32943
Bug ID: 32943
Summary: libgprofng.so: undefined reference to
`std::ios_base_library_init()'
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Also fixed on 2.43 and 2.44 branches.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
--- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4056b58ad334246840a81a4cac228863ea45b79d
commit 4056b58ad334246840a81a4cac228
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32809
--- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=33578177adc8c04f2341548d63dbf00c03e188a2
commit 33578177adc8c04f2341548d63dbf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #13)
> For the non-fat case, we get:
>
> a.c
> ```
> extern void foo1(void);
> void foo2(void) { foo1(); }
> void foo3(void) {}
> ```
>
> b.c:
> ```
> extern void foo2(void
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
For the non-fat case, we get:
a.c
```
extern void foo1(void);
void foo2(void) { foo1(); }
void foo3(void) {}
```
b.c:
```
extern void foo2(void);
extern void foo3(void);
void foo1(void) { foo3(); }
int main
14 matches
Mail list logo
