[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread mmalcomson at nvidia dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #17 from Matthew Malcomson --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16) > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #14) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > > Created attachment 16054 [details] > > > A patch > > > > > >

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #14) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > Created attachment 16054 [details] > > A patch > > > > Please try this one on the current master branch. > > It se

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #16054|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread mmalcomson at nvidia dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #14 from Matthew Malcomson --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > Created attachment 16054 [details] > A patch > > Please try this one on the current master branch. It seems to exhibit the same problem. I think it's doing

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread mmalcomson at nvidia dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #13 from Matthew Malcomson --- Created attachment 16055 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16055&action=edit Default AArch64 linker script with slightly modified .tbss/.tdata order As requested, the hacked lin

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #16053|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #10) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #8) > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > > > (In reply to Matt

[Bug ld/32917] „warning: symbol in unexpected section“ is being spat out when trying to link with LTO on SuperH

2025-04-29 Thread qubos at outlook dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32917 --- Comment #1 from Quentin Boswank --- The responsible message can be found in elf32-sh.c in a function handling relaxation, R_SH_USES to be exact. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32917] „warning: symbol in unexpected section“ is being spat out when trying to link with LTO on SuperH

2025-04-29 Thread qubos at outlook dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32917 Quentin Boswank changed: What|Removed |Added Target||sh4a_nofpu-elf CC|

[Bug ld/32917] „warning: symbol in unexpected section“ is being spat out when trying to link with LTO on SuperH

2025-04-29 Thread qubos at outlook dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32917 Quentin Boswank changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|„warning: symbol in |„warning: symbol in

[Bug ld/32917] New: „warning: symbol in unexpected section“

2025-04-29 Thread qubos at outlook dot de
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32917 Bug ID: 32917 Summary: „warning: symbol in unexpected section“ Product: binutils Version: 2.44 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread mmalcomson at nvidia dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #10 from Matthew Malcomson --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #8) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #5) > > > > I think

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #8) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #5) > > > I think that this proposed patch could allow putting the PT_TLS s

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread mmalcomson at nvidia dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #8 from Matthew Malcomson --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > (In reply to Matthew Malcomson from comment #5) > > I think that this proposed patch could allow putting the PT_TLS segment > > offset past the end of the file (

[Bug ld/32896] GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align

2025-04-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5e247da8afb8b764cb111ce1a05e8cb8862a7f98 commit 5e247da8afb8b764cb111ce1a05e8cb8862a7f98 Au