https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603
--- Comment #14 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=31e9e2e8d1090da0c1da97a70005d8841fff8ddd
commit 31e9e2e8d1090da0c1da97a70
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603
--- Comment #13 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0b7f992b78fe0984fc7d84cc748d0794e4a400e3
commit 0b7f992b78fe0984fc7d84cc7
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603
--- Comment #12 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6d74c1f313df5e82bb9ef0940a477cba5d76db00
commit 6d74c1f313df5e82bb9ef0940a477cba5d76db0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32896
Bug ID: 32896
Summary: GNU ld does not enforce PT_TLS segment
p_offset/p_vaddr congruity with p_align
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30144
--- Comment #6 from Pali Rohár ---
Created attachment 16036
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16036&action=edit
ld_pei386_entry_point.diff
Nick, I have tried something, it is in the attachment. But it needs to be
improve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30144
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Pali Rohár from comment #3)
> > Looking into this, it is actually quite hard to predict the mangling of the
> > entry symbol name.
>
> Nick, cannot be 32-bit x86 PE ld easily extended in this
